By on
Industry News
Questions & Answers
  abuse  ADA  adoption  alabama  Alaska  alias  alias names  Amazon  arizona  arkan  arkansas  arrest warrants  assault  Austin  babysitter  background check  Background Checks  backlog  Baltimore  ban  ban the box  ban the box review  bus  cab  california  canada  cannabis  chicago  child abuse  child abuse and neglect registry  child care  church  CIA  Cincinnati  City of Buffalo  class action  cleveland  coach  college  colorado  columbia  Columbia City  compliance  Connecticu  Connecticut  contractor  contractor background checks  Cook County  copy of a background check report  council members  Credit  credit check  credit report  credit reports  criminal background check  Criminal History  dallas  day care  daycare  delaware  Dept. of Commerce  DHS  disclosure  District of Columbia  doctor  driver  driver license checks  driving record  drug  drug screening  Drug Testing  DUI  education verification  EEOC  embezzlement  employee  employee background checks  employment law  employment verification  equal pay  e-verify  Executive background checks  expungement  fair chance business pledge  Fair Credit Reporting Act  FBI  FBI backgroundcheck  FCIHO  FCRA  federal  Federal Reserve Board  Federal Security  financial background check  fingerprint  firefighter  Florida  FMCA  free background check  Georgia  girl scout  government  gun  healthcare  hillary clinton  hotel  housing  human trafficking  idaho  Illinois  Illionois  Immigration and Nationality Act  Independent Contractors  Indiana  Indianapolis  instant criminal background check  interim security clearance  iowa  irs  journalist  juvenile records  Kansas  kentucky  killer  landlord  landlords  las vegas  lawsuit  license  long term care  Los Angeles  louisiana  Louisville  lyft  Marijuana  Marion County  Maryand  maryland  Massachusetts  medical  Medical Examination Report  medical marijuana  medical marijuana act  Michigan  military  minn  minnesota  misconduct  mississippi  Missouri  Montgomery County  MVR  nanny  navy  navy yard shooter  nebraska  negligent hiring lawsuit  Nevada  new hampshire  new jersey  new MEC form  new mexico  new orleans  new york  new york city  newark  NLRB  north carolina  nurse  Obama  ohio  oklahoma  on demand economy  ongoing criminal monitoring  OPM  oregon  parent  Pennsylvania  pensylvania  Philadelphia  Philidelphi  Philidelphia  police  Portland  pre-employment screening  preschool  professional license verification  public  real estate  rent  Rhode Island  Richmond  ridesharing  Rochester  salary history  salt lake city  San Francisco  Schenectady  school  seat  seattle  SelectCHECK  sex offender  Sex Offender Registry  Sexual Assault  social media  social media checks  south carolina  sport  starbucks  state background check  State Employment  student  teacher  Tennesee  Tennessee  terrorist watch list  Texas  transportation  TSA  Uber  universit  university  us senate  USA  USIS  utah  Verification Checks  Vermont  virginia  volunteer  volunteer background check  Washington  washington DC  white house  Wisconsin  youth-organization  youth-sport

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.