Blog

 
     

backgroundchecks.com Legislation and Compliance Update - Connecticut Limits Employers’ Use of Credit Reports

By Michael Klazema on 8/11/2011

With important exceptions, a new Connecticut law prohibits employers from requiring employees to consent to a credit check as a condition of employment. The new law takes effect on October 1, 2011.

The law is available at http://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/ACT/PA/2011PA-00223-R00SB-00361-PA.htm. The most important part of the statute reads as follows:

No employer or employer's agent, representative or designee may require an employee or prospective employee to consent to a request for a credit report that contains information about the employee's or prospective employee's credit score, credit account balances, payment history, savings or checking account balances or savings or checking account numbers as a condition of employment unless:


1.    such employer is a financial institution,

2.    such report is required by law,

3.    the employer reasonably believes that the employee has engaged in specific activity that constitutes a violation of the law related to the employee's employment, or

4.    such report is substantially related to the employee's current or potential job or the employer has a bona fide purpose for requesting or using information in the credit report that is substantially job-related and is disclosed in writing to the employee or applicant.


Generally, employment-purposes credit reports do not include credit scores but do include information about credit account balances and payment history.

The statute defines “substantially related to the employee's current or potential job" as meaning that:

the information contained in the credit report is related to the position for which the employee or prospective employee who is the subject of the report is being evaluated because the position:

A.   Is a managerial position which involves setting the direction or control of a business, division, unit or an agency of a business;

B.   Involves access to customers', employees' or the employer's personal or financial information other than information customarily provided in a retail transaction;

C.   Involves a fiduciary responsibility to the employer, including, but not limited to, the authority to issue payments, collect debts, transfer money or enter into contracts;

D.   Provides an expense account or corporate debit or credit card;

E.   Provides access to (i) confidential or proprietary business information, or (ii) information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, process or trade secret that: (I) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from the disclosure or use of the information; and (II) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy; or

F.    Involves access to the employer's nonfinancial assets valued at two thousand five dollars or more, including, but not limited to, museum and library collections and to prescription drugs and other pharmaceuticals.


Employers should be wary of literal reliance on part (F) since very few jobs have no access to assets valued at $2,005 or more. Employers may want to embrace a more cautious interpretation of “access” – that the access must be more than the access that a customer or the general public would have.

The statute provides for a civil penalty of $300 per violation.


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.