Contractor Pretends to Be Vietnam War Hero in Order win Government Contract

By Michael Klazema on 4/20/2012

In Kansas City, Missouri, Warren Parker, owner of Silver Star Construction created a false war hero history in order to gain access to potential government contracts worth millions.  When Parker’s business started failing, he set his sights on a government program designed to help companies owned by disabled veterans.  The Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Program gives veterans’ companies contacts totaling $7.5 million in potential contracts.  This was enough to tempt Parker into creating an elaborate story in which he was Vietnam War Veteran with three silver stars, three purple hearts, four bronze stars, and more than twelve other heroic commendations.  Unfortunately for Parker, a background check revealed that he had served only six short months in the National Guard which never left Missouri and his only accomplishment there was an Expert Rifle badge.  This wasn’t exactly the valiant hero he had made himself out to be.

In 2009, the Government Accountability Office discovered fraud in their veteran’s program.  They didn’t say how this was brought to their attention, but because of this, they performed background checks on those in the program and found Parker’s many service discrepancies.  This caused them to investigate Silver Star Construction.  After their investigation, they eventually took him to a court which found him guilty of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, major program fraud, wire fraud, money laundering and making a false statement.  He now faces a $6.8 million judgment and up to 30 years in a federal prison.  His wife and son who also work with his company are also facing charges.

This kind of program fraud is on the rise due to the sluggish economy, and government agencies are having to take closer looks at the companies and individuals applying for funding and other types of assistance.  Luckily, in this case, they decided to perform background checks on their program participants.  When large agencies and corporations decide to award employment opportunities or contracts like these, it’s a good idea to make sure they are awarding their bid to companies and individuals with verified credentials.  By using, they can carry out employment verification, reference verification and license verification searches to be sure the company has the experience they claim on their application.  Additionally, in order to avoid those with a history of criminal behavior like fraud, they can access national databases like US OneSEARCH.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services.  Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.