More Than Half of Illinois Daycares Have Not Been Inspected

By Michael Klazema on 4/25/2012

When a new daycare opens in any state, it must undergo inspections that will assure its safety and quality for the care of children.  All workers who work at that facility must also undergo training and background checks in order to prove their expertise and ability to work with children.  Unfortunately, in Illinois, of the 12,000 day care facilities currently in operation, more than 6,000 have not yet had their required inspections and are waiting for their background checks to be processed.  Illinois daycares are responsible for the care of approximately 300,000 children, but right now, it is unclear if they are maintaining health, safety, and curriculum standards or if they are employing lawful individuals. 

The Illinois Department of Child and Family Services plans to hire four new people to take care of their backlog of background checks alone.  They also hope to hire more inspectors, so they can catch up on the annual requirement.  Every daycare receives a three year license which includes both planned and unplanned inspections to make sure they are up to code.  It will likely take several months to hire and train new inspectors to take care of these procedures.  Some daycares worry that their grant money will be revoked because their licenses have expired.  They will have to wait for their turn on the long list of inspections in order to get those renewals though.  The DCFS says that in order to hire additional staff, they will have to cut funding from other family programs, though they didn’t comment as to which ones.

It’s unclear how the department got so far behind in the first place.  Either the rate of daycares opening has increased at unexpected rates or they simply allowed their work to pile up.  It might be a good idea for the department to outsource their background check processes in order to save money and time.  By partnering with experienced organizations like, they can gain affordable and instant access to national criminal databases like US OneSEARCH and US Offender OneSEARCH.  Then, with the money they save on those types of searches, they can allocate more funds to the hiring of inspectors.  Otherwise, Illinois may be a magnet for sex offenders seeking employment in childcare organizations until the problem is resolved.  There has been no mention of whether or not the department is making changes, but the media attention they are getting has certainly put pressure on their program that should move them to quicker action.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) and co-founder of the Expungement Clearinghouse - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services.  Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.