Massachusetts Revises Law to Both Give and Restrict Employer’s Access to Criminal Records

By Michael Klazema on 5/21/2012

On Monday, Massachusetts made updates to its CORI (Criminal Offender Record Information) system, making access to its records much easier for employers.  However, it will limit just how far background checks will be able to see to just ten years.  They made these changes in an effort to help people with old convictions find work so they can move on with their lives.

Many organizations believe the right for employers to know as much as possible about the criminal history of their workers takes precedence though.  On the other hand, a Massachusetts coalition of 125 different community organizations, religious institutions, and labor unions wants to bar access for screening companies that perform background checks, if their searches also extend beyond the CORI system, including checking court records at the source in each jurisdictions as that information might go much farther back and sometimes contain more details.

A spokesperson for the NAPBS stated that such a move would, “harm Massachusetts’s employers [by placing] restrictions on what information they’re allowed to use.”  Proponents of the law though see it another way.  Steve O’Neil, spokesman for a prisoner advocacy group says that the measure they advocate for is meant “to ensure that criminal records that are nonconvictions, very old convictions, or inaccurate would not be used against them and prevent them from getting housing or employment in the future.”  For now, employers, landlords, and background screening companies can access the CORI registry unrestricted, while understanding that search results are limited to the ten year rule except in the case of homicides and sex offenses. 

So far, Massachusetts is the only state to consider restricting access to its CORI system if users also look elsewhere for information, but it’s definitely receiving attention from groups in other states.  Most of these groups are background screening companies who believe that the information they provide is crucial to a transparent hiring processes, especially in terms of sensitive positions.  If companies use reputable organizations like, the criminal records they receive would not show arrest records, but only instead focus on convictions.  Additionally, updates their records constantly, sometimes having more up to date records than government organizations like the FBI finger print databases.  Their records not only give criminal conviction histories from all states through databases like US OneSEARCH, but also convictions under alternate identities and previous names from databases like US AliasSEARCH.  Are companies ready to give up this kind of access to help former convicts or will other states protect their companies by not following in the footsteps of Massachusetts?

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services.  Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.