Boston’s Gaming Commission Will Not Need to Worry about Background Checks (updated)

By Michael Klazema on 5/29/2012

The House and Senate sent a bill to Governor Deval Patrick last week that would add funding to family shelters, youth jobs, and low-income disabled residents in Boston.  The spending amounted to $72 million for the rest of the year due to funding that would have run out in June.  A portion of the bill, including requiring the Gaming Commission to require background checks and drug screening for all employees, was amended at the last minute, and he decided to veto that section.  The amendment was apparently in response to the Commission attempting to hire Stanley McGee as its new interim executive director.  McGee previously settled a lawsuit out of court with the family of a boy he was accused of sexually abusing.  Patrick did not seem to think this warranted stricter requirements for the state agency though.  Currently, McGee is an assistant economic development secretary for Patrick’s administration, which is causing some to wonder if Patrick had alternate motives for his veto.

Patrick explained his decision by saying that, “the highest levels of background checks and screening may not be necessary nor appropriate for every employee.”  Currently, the Gaming Commission uses its own discretion when it comes to hiring, though some believe any agency with such status should be upheld to the highest of standards.  Now, though they have the option to carry out background checks if they so choose, hiring and the consequences of their hiring will be completely up to the Gaming Commission.  Brad Jones, House minority leader and proposer of the amendment, says that any future consequences on their part will now also, “fall on the doorstep of the governor.” Other representatives are concerned that the veto will lead to more corruption.  With the Gaming Commission being such a tempting industry for financial criminals and other types of criminal interests, “leaving weak links in the chain is an invitation.” said Representative Daniel Winslow as he reminded reporters of mobster James “Whitey” Bulger as a past hire of the Commission.  He, among others, is concerned that this will not be the last major criminal to find their way into the Commission.

The question seems to be whether or not all employees of the Gaming Commission would really need such deep background checking.  The Governor cited secretaries as an example.  When it was the head of the interim Head getting looked into though, he stepped down before background checks could be finished, which does look suspicious to those now calling for the extra safety measures.  One representative hired an outside company, much like which turned up the previous arrests of McGee, including the sexual abuse situation.  Companies like can find convictions relating to these matters using national databases like US OneSEARCH and US AliasSEARCH, which can in some cases catch criminals who have been convicted of crimes in other states before they enter sensitive positions, such as those affiliated with the Gaming Commission.  These databases are regularly updated by dedicated teams, making sure companies who partner with have the most accurate information possible for their hiring processes.


Update 5/31/2012:

it seems like the Massachusetts House of Representatives felt strongly about the full background screening requirement and on Wednesday May 30th voted unanimously to override the Governor's veto, ensuring that all employees of the state's Gaming Commission are again required to undergo a full criminal background check and pass a drug screen test.


About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) and cofounder of the Expungement Clearinghouse - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services.  Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit


Source for update:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.