Legislation and Compliance Update: Vermont Limits Credit Reports

By Michael Klazema on 5/31/2012

Vermont has become the eighth state to limit an employer’s use of credit information in making employment decisions. On May 17, the governor signed Senate Bill 95, which prohibits employers from asking for or considering an applicant’s or employee’s credit information. The prohibition applies both to credit report and to credit history obtained from sources other than credit reporting agencies.

The new law appears to go into effect July 1.

The law creates the following exemptions:

a.     When the information is required by state or federal law or regulation.

b.     The position of employment involves access to confidential financial information, meaning sensitive financial information of commercial value that a customer or client of the employer gives explicit authorization for the employer to obtain, process, and store and that the employer entrusts only to managers or employees as a necessary function of their job duties

c.     The employer is a financial institution or a credit union defined under state law.

d.     The position of employment is that of a law enforcement officer, emergency medical personnel, or a firefighter as defined under state law.

e.     The position of employment requires a financial fiduciary responsibility to the employer or a client of the employer, including the authority to issue payments, collect debts, transfer money, or enter into contracts.

f.      The employer can demonstrate that the information is a valid and reliable predictor of employee performance in the specific position of employment.

g.     The position of employment involves access to an employer’s payroll information.

Even under these exemptions, the law prohibits employers from using the credit information “as the sole factor in decisions regarding employment, compensation, or a term, condition, or privilege of employment.”

The law also creates new procedural obligations for employers seeking credit information. When obtaining or acting on credit information, the employer must:

1.     Obtain the employee’s or applicant’s written consent each time the employer seeks to obtain the employee’s or applicant’s credit report.

2.     Disclose in writing to the employee or applicant the employer’s reasons for accessing the credit report.

3.     If an adverse employment action is taken based upon the credit report, disclose the reasons for the action in writing.

4.     Ensure that none of the costs associated with obtaining an employee’s or an applicant’s credit report or credit history are passed on to the employee or applicant.

5.     Ensure that the information in the employee’s or applicant’s credit report or credit history is kept confidential.

6.     If the employment is terminated or the applicant is not hired by the employer, provide the employee or applicant with the credit report or have the credit report destroyed in a secure manner which ensures the confidentiality of the information in the report.

The text of the law is available at

Employers should immediately review their use of credit reports in Vermont.

The other states that have limited the use of credit reports for employment are Washington (2007), Hawaii (2009), Oregon (2010), Illinois (2010), Connecticut (2011), Maryland (2011), and California (2011). Additionally, the National Conference of State Legislatures ( tracks proposed laws relating to the use of credit reports in employment. The current link for 2012 information is

Disclaimer: This is an alert to make you aware of a law that may affect your background screening program. This is not legal advice.

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.