Woman Previously Charged With Theft Steals $1 Mil from NY Archdiocese

By Michael Klazema on 6/5/2012

Sixty-seven-year-old woman Anita Collins, worked for eight years in accounts payable for the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York as a loyal, unassuming employee. Known for her hard work and volunteer activities, the check-writing she performed as part of her job duties went unquestioned. Recently, however, Ms. Collins was charged with stealing more than $1 million from the archdiocese over the course of seven years.


According to Manhattan prosecutors, Ms. Collins did not live an extravagant lifestyle. What detectives did discover in her modest three-bedroom apartment, however, were a large collection of expensive dolls. The neighborhood mail carrier remarked that Ms. Collins and her daughter, who shares the apartment with her, received “packages like no tomorrow.”


The archdiocese became aware of the problem of the missing money in December, 2011, after the annual audit indicated something was wrong. Ms. Collins was confronted regarding the matter, and was fired thereafter. When the archdiocese initially hired her in 2003, they did not perform criminal background checks as they now do. Since Ms. Collins’s firing and referral to the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R.Vance Jr., it has become apparent that she was previously convicted of grand larceny, and pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in another case.


Ms. Collins’s access to the archdiocese’s checkbook allowed her to issue checks in her son’s name, and then would change records to make it appear as if the check were issued to a legitimate vendor. The check amounts were kept to less than $2,500 so supervisor approval was not required as it is for checks of larger amounts. Charged with first-degree grand larceny and falsifying business records, Ms. Collins faces a possible maximum of 25 years in prison.


By not performing a background check, archdiocese staff were not aware of Ms. Collinss criminal record. Arrested in January 1986 on multiple counts of criminal forgery and grand larceny, she pleaded guilty to a Class A misdemeanor and received three years’ probation. In 1999, Ms. Collins was arrested and charged with stealing at least $46,000 over the course of 16 months from AccuStaff, a Manhattan temporary employment agency. She pleaded guilty to grand larceny in that case, and received five years’ probation, plus required to pay $10,000 in restitution to AccuStaff and perform100 hours of community service. Ms. Collins was still on probation when she was hired by the archdiocese.

Although background checks were not a requirementat the time of hire for Ms. Collins, a search of current employees would have likely exposed her criminal past sooner. Organizations and businesses who rely on employees to perform financial transactions can surely benefit from services such as those provided by With US OneSEARCH, you get instant results from more than 355 million criminal records from counties, Department of Corrections (DOC), Administration of Courts (AOC) and State Sex Offender Registries covering 49 states plus Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and Guam. Also included are national and international terrorism sources, more than 4.1 million photos, and their proprietary database of previously completed reports. A business or organization should not let itself be exposed to potential criminals with a known background, without protection.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) and co-founder of the Expungement Clearinghouse - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services.  Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit




Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.