D.C. Council Votes to Suspend Background Checks for Employees

By Michael Klazema on 6/7/2012

In a stunning reversal of newly passed legislation, the D.C. Council has voted to exempt council employees from receiving background checks. The council decided earlier this year that newly hired city employees would need to submit to background investigations, including credit checks, for employees "whose primary duties are of a policy determining, confidential or policy advocacy character." This was in response to allegations of careless hiring practices.

However, language that was put into the 2013 budget by Council Chairman Kwame Brown states that council staff members would be exempt from the new law. This could put the council in a conflicting position with Mayor Vincent Gray, who arranged for more thorough screenings of his staff members after it was discovered several of them were hiding criminal pasts.

Although the council members will be exempt from receiving background checks, according to David Zvenyach, general counsel for the legislative body, he is working with Chairman Brown to build a new policy for the background search process. Zvenyach explained that the proposed exemption was in order “to fix a previous oversight” in the law, and Brown supports “clean governance.” Even a temporary suspension of the background check policy has some raising eyebrows. “I think it’s bizarre,” states former federal agent Thomas Martin. Martin, who now runs Martin Investigative Services, is “puzzled” over why any government body would make such a decision. According to an official who wishes to remain anonymous, there were complaints by council members that the searches were too “administratively onerous, time-consuming, [and] expensive.”

But recent events seem to indicate that the background checks are necessary. Councilman Brown is currently under investigation, and the reversal was passed less than two weeks after a councilman went to prison for taking money from the city. Plus, there have been repeated allegations of corruption charged against non-elected District employees. Six council aides were recently implicated for receiving unemployment benefits while on the city’s payroll, and in the past decade there have been guilty pleas from other city employees for offenses ranging from bribery to embezzlement. Martin believes this kind of history more than warrants the requirement of background searches for council members. He thinks that they “absolutely, 100 percent need to” conduct the checks due to the ongoing problems of corruption in the District. Perhaps they should take a cue from Dayton, Ohio, as referenced in the article Dayton Making One Hundred Percent of City Positions Background Check Required.

Although the D.C. Council thought the process of checking the backgrounds of employees was too difficult and “time-consuming”, it doesn’t need to be. Why put the security of your business at risk? You can still protect yourself and save time. A company like provides several affordable options to get instant results for a criminal record check. Their US OneSEARCH provides information from more than 355 million criminal records from counties, Department of Corrections (DOC), Administration of Courts (AOC) and State Sex Offender Registries covering 49 states plus Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and Guam. Also included are national and international terrorism sources, more than 4.1 million photos, and their proprietary database of previously completed reports. Or get even more detailed results with US AliasSEARCH. US AliasSEARCH is a multi-faceted search that combines US OneSEARCH with the known aliases provided from a SSN trace. With this trace, they can obtain a list of alias names, including maiden names. All information derived is then run through the US OneSEARCH instant criminal database.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.