Some Small Businesses Struggle with New Background Check Guidelines

By Michael Klazema on 7/9/2012

The announced crack down by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in the illegal use of criminal histories when making hiring decisions has led to confusion for many small businesses across the country. As discussed in the post EEOC Issues Guidance on Employers' Use of Criminal History in Employment Decisions, the guidelines do not prohibit the use of criminal histories uncovered during background checks in making hiring decisions, but in how the records are used.

Nebraska car dealership owner Brian Hamilton said, “We have tests that all of our managers take that keep them up to date on labor rules. But I was not aware of that one.” Hamilton employs about 160 people in his four dealerships. According to Houston labor attorney Laurence E. Stuart, “Many companies that size don’t have an H.R. person and get minimal education about compliance issues.” However, the EEOC guidelines, which aim to prohibit discrimination, have been in place since the 1970s. What is new in the policy is the requirement of employers to establish procedures showing they are not using criminal records as a way of discriminating by race or national origin.


Part of the guidelines by the commission warn to not rely on arrest records in hiring decisions. The reasoning being, “arrests are not proof of criminal conduct”, and not hiring based on an arrest record could be discrimination. But, according to the guidelines, an employer can “make an employment decision based on the conduct underlying the arrest if the conduct makes the individual unfit for the position in question.” And an employer is allowed to not hire an applicant if a criminal conviction is discovered in their background check, if the employer is able to demonstrate the reason for exclusion is “job-related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity.

Mr. Stuart believes employers would rather have less ambiguous criteria “and a simple yes-or-no answer to a hiring decision.” But, he says that the EEOC is requiring “employers to first determine what criminal convictions might rule applicants out for each job and then judge each candidate against the job in question, which could be a painstaking process.” According to Chicago area human resources consultant Andrea Herran, “It’s almost like you’re being squeezed on both sides of the law,” Ms. Herran said. “If somebody’s making them nervous with their criminal history, and they’re worried about getting sued on the other side, what’s a business owner supposed to do?”

Find beter information than arrest records by using the services of a company like With access to countless criminal databases nationwide they provide several with instant results. Their background searches can uncover information from 49 states (plus Washington D.C., Guam, and Puerto Rico), even photos. Or try theirOngoing Criminal Monitoring tool, which allows you to automatically run a continuous background check against a name and date of birth, and they will notify you via email of any new information that may appear on the record. They will run the name for one year and remind you when it is time to renew the monitoring, and you can remove the name from being monitored at any time.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.