Some Small Businesses Struggle with New Background Check Guidelines

By Michael Klazema on 7/9/2012

The announced crack down by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in the illegal use of criminal histories when making hiring decisions has led to confusion for many small businesses across the country. As discussed in the post EEOC Issues Guidance on Employers' Use of Criminal History in Employment Decisions, the guidelines do not prohibit the use of criminal histories uncovered during background checks in making hiring decisions, but in how the records are used.

Nebraska car dealership owner Brian Hamilton said, “We have tests that all of our managers take that keep them up to date on labor rules. But I was not aware of that one.” Hamilton employs about 160 people in his four dealerships. According to Houston labor attorney Laurence E. Stuart, “Many companies that size don’t have an H.R. person and get minimal education about compliance issues.” However, the EEOC guidelines, which aim to prohibit discrimination, have been in place since the 1970s. What is new in the policy is the requirement of employers to establish procedures showing they are not using criminal records as a way of discriminating by race or national origin.


Part of the guidelines by the commission warn to not rely on arrest records in hiring decisions. The reasoning being, “arrests are not proof of criminal conduct”, and not hiring based on an arrest record could be discrimination. But, according to the guidelines, an employer can “make an employment decision based on the conduct underlying the arrest if the conduct makes the individual unfit for the position in question.” And an employer is allowed to not hire an applicant if a criminal conviction is discovered in their background check, if the employer is able to demonstrate the reason for exclusion is “job-related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity.

Mr. Stuart believes employers would rather have less ambiguous criteria “and a simple yes-or-no answer to a hiring decision.” But, he says that the EEOC is requiring “employers to first determine what criminal convictions might rule applicants out for each job and then judge each candidate against the job in question, which could be a painstaking process.” According to Chicago area human resources consultant Andrea Herran, “It’s almost like you’re being squeezed on both sides of the law,” Ms. Herran said. “If somebody’s making them nervous with their criminal history, and they’re worried about getting sued on the other side, what’s a business owner supposed to do?”

Find beter information than arrest records by using the services of a company like With access to countless criminal databases nationwide they provide several with instant results. Their background searches can uncover information from 49 states (plus Washington D.C., Guam, and Puerto Rico), even photos. Or try theirOngoing Criminal Monitoring tool, which allows you to automatically run a continuous background check against a name and date of birth, and they will notify you via email of any new information that may appear on the record. They will run the name for one year and remind you when it is time to renew the monitoring, and you can remove the name from being monitored at any time.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.

  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 

  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through