Blog

 
     

Another Look at Newark’s Ban the Box Ordinance

By Michael Klazema on 11/16/2012

In October, backgroundchecks.com reviewed Newark, New Jersey’s new “ban-the-box” ordinance, which becomes effective November 18, 2012. At that time, we provided some of the details that employers need to comply with when conducting criminal background checks or when considering an applicant’s or employee’s criminal history.  The ordinance places restrictions on employers with five or more employees who use criminal background checks on prospective new hires, and requires employers to modify their background check processes. You can access a copy of our review at: http://www.backgroundbiz.com/compliance/complianceupdate_10262012.html

A specific question was asked about whether the ordinance applied to independent insurance agents or insurance producers.  That is, whether an employer, when contracting with independent agents or producers, is subject to the law’s restrictions and requirements pertaining to conducting criminal record checks and considering criminal history in the hiring and employment processes.  We look at the law again in an attempt to find answers.

The law does not explicitly refer to independent agents or any other kinds of contractors. Further, the law does not define “employee,” but it does define “employment” as “any occupation, vocation, job, work, or employment with or without pay, including temporary or seasonal work, contracted work, or contingent work, and work through the services of a temporary or other employment agency, or any form of vocational or educational training with or without pay,” if the physical location of the employment is in whole or in part with the City of Newark.

One argument is that independent agents and other contractors are subject to the law because the definition of employment includes the words “any occupation, vocation, job, work or employment” and “contracted work.” Also, Section III of the ordinance introduces each substantive prohibition with the words, “In connection with any decision regarding employment”, thereby including all professions because it uses the defined term “employment.”

On the flip side, the other argument is independent agents and other contractors are (at least partially) not subject to the law because Section III often applies its substantive prohibitions to “candidates,” who are defined as potential employees, and the term “employee” is not defined. Because these prohibitions do not use the defined term “employment,” the ordinance is ambiguous, leaving the door open for interpretation.

So, the short answer to the question is we are unsure.  The first argument is probably stronger, in which case the ordinance would apply to independent agents and contractors, but we cannot be sure until either the Newark City Council or a court’s decision provides clarification.

A copy of the ordinance is available at: http://www.employmentlawalert.com/uploads/file/12-1630(1).pdf

If you have any other questions, please contact client services and we will be happy to address them.


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • April 19

    In a post-Penn State scandal world, universities are more aware than ever of the need to protect students by vetting faculty. The extent of this vetting and its implementation are hot topics causing controversy on campuses nationwide.


  • April 18 Amazon’s criminal background checks look back seven years and consider any convictions from that time. All finalists must complete criminal background searches, reference checks, and drug tests.
  • April 17

    From entry-level positions to roles involving “Top Secret” security clearances, military roles can involve a variety of different background investigations. We look at what different types of military background checks entail.


  • April 17 A new CNBC series is looking at true HR stories and their lessons. The most recent installment looked at the consequences of not running background checks.
  • April 12 Complicated by patchwork legislation and continuing federal prohibition, marijuana legalization poses several challenges for employers and would-be employees alike. Despite its legal status in a growing number of states, marijuana continues to negatively impact job-seekers.
  • April 12 Familiarizing yourself with the legality of background checks is essential. Continue reading about laws and regulations.
  • April 11

    Understanding the background check obligations in your industry and state.

  • April 10 A former employee of a senior assisted living community is facing charges for stealing from a resident. The alleged theft occurred after the employee gained access to the patient’s credit cards and checking account.
  • April 06 Background checks aren’t pass or fail. Employers consider various factors before making any hiring decision based on background check data.
  • April 06  Level 1 and Level 2 are terms used in Florida law to describe background check requirements for employers. We look at what a Level 2 background check entails.