Ohio’s Attorney General Reveals Troubling Updates to Background Check Laws

By Michael Klazema on 2/5/2013

In Columbus, Ohio, the Attorney General’s office revealed changes to their background check records. As of now, background checks processed by their office will no longer show any records that did not result in convictions. In other words, employers who use their background checks will not be privy to arrests or charges if there was no conviction. This is in order to protect those who might have been arrested under false pretenses and had charges that were later dropped. Although the change is meant to protect such people, others fear it will keep important information from potential employers, thus giving them a false sense of security concerning their applicants.

For the most part, these changes will affect the records of juveniles, adults with recent arrests that have not yet been resolved, and adults who violated bail in years past. Ohio’s criminal investigation agency has already begun the process of letting employers know about the changes. However, they are just one group among several that are not on board with these revisions. Steve Raubenolt, Deputy Superintendent of the Ohio Bureau of Investigation, said the changes are “giving prospective employers a peace of mind about someone they shouldn’t have.” He gave examples of his concerns, saying the bureau recently processed police department background checks for applicants who had drunk driving arrests and even a pending murder charge. The murder charge was never closed, because the accused was found to be mentally incompetent. While that may free her of any conviction, it still doesn’t make her any better of a candidate to become a police officer. Had the new changes been in affect at the time the background checks were processed, those two people might have been hired and put into highly-sensitive state positions.

Even the Attorney General himself, Mike DeWine, expressed concern about several juvenile offenders who probably shouldn’t be considered for certain jobs. These include serious crimes such as rape convictions, aggravated murder, murder, and more. While these offenders may have technically been youths when they committed the crime, he’s not sure if that makes them any less dangerous as they age. As a result of his concerns, he is urging lawmakers to fix the issues inherent in the new laws. County clerks of courts are also being urged to report case results as soon as possible. Lawmakers have already heard some of these concerns and may be willing to make changes. State Senator Bill Seitz claimed the new laws weren’t meant to reward those who, “never showed up and faced the music,” but there were many other unforeseen consequences of their changes. On the other side of the issue, Senator Shirley Smith claims there’s no reason to change the law, and she doesn’t want employers to “rush to judgment and prohibit a person from going to work when they have not been convicted.”

If you are an employer who plans to use background checks, it’s important to choose a company like who can give you more details you might want  to consider to make an informed decision. Besides looking for a variety of criminal records including non convictions with their US OneSEARCH tool, which has access to countless sources across the nation, it might also be a good idea to invest in Ongoing Criminal Monitoring, so you can be made aware of any new records that pop up after hiring.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) and cofounder of the Expungement Clearinghouse - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit




Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.