Fraud against Customers and Organizations by Their Own Employees Increased Significantly in 2012

By Michael Klazema on 2/18/2013

Fraud is a serious crime, and unfortunately, it often occurs from within the organization itself. According to the Staff Fraud Database of CIFAS, insider fraud increased in 2012 by over 40%. That’s in comparison to 2011 numbers. This increase occurred in several areas, including the fraudulent obtainment of employment, staff theft or deception, and the personal use of customer data.

In 2011, there were 378 cases of reported insider fraud, while in 2012 that number rose to 539. 268 of those had to do with some kind of theft or deception and 171 stemmed from application fraud at the beginning of employment. This shows an overlap of crimes coming from the same people and continuing throughout employment.

The most problematic type of fraud, as noted by CIFAS Communications Manager, Richard Hurley, comes in the form of gaining employment through dishonest means. While applicants might fill out a thorough application, much of that information could easily be falsified. If the company does not perform thorough background checks, those lies are missed. In other cases though, a background check is run, but the information on the application is a case of identity theft, and so the wrong person’s history is reviewed. Once these fraudulent applicants make it into the organization, they then have access to sensitive information, making it easy to carry out more crimes, either against the company or the company’s customers.

Once hired, the next most common type of insider fraud has to do with stealing money from customer accounts or the company itself. This type of crime saw a spike of 22% in 2012. While some believe this to be due to the struggling economy, others think the increase only shows more successful convictions and record keeping. This could mean companies have gotten better at catching thieves in the act and that such crimes have always been this high, but the steep rise is alarming no matter the reason. Hurley commented that these types of fraud can have a negative “impact on balance sheets, customer confidence, and staff morale.” It can even cause the organizations to be subject to law suits and other legal punishments.

As a result, companies everywhere are cracking down on employee vetting procedures. Some are undergoing training to help them spot worthwhile and honest employees, and still more are hiring outside organizations to make sure the proper measures are being taken. This ranges from everything from fingerprinting and identity verification to reference and criminal records checks. Hurley says these beefed up background checks before employment is worthwhile, because “the cost of employing someone who has made fraudulent declarations about their employment skills and history is more than financial.” It can end up hurting a company’s reputation, which in this economy, might be difficult to recover from.

Although not every case of fraud can be stopped, with a thorough background check from, companies can have access to some of the most accurate databases in the US. The identities of potential employees should be verified with products like US OneTRACE, which takes the given SSN and traces all names and addresses associated with that number. To make sure potential employees have the education and experience required for the job they’re applying to, companies should also use products like Past Employment Verification and Education Verification to confirm a given history. If employers are able to determine more fraud from the start, they will consequently be able to decrease the amount of insider fraud their company suffers from down the road.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) and cofounder of the Expungement Clearinghouse - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.