Drug Testing Shows More than Five Percent Increase in Positive Results

By Michael Klazema on 3/20/2013

Besides passing a background check, many jobs also require new hires to undergo a pre-employment drug-screening test. According to the Drug Testing Index (DTI), the rate of job candidates who failed the urine drug test has increased 5.7 percent in the first half of 2012 compared to 2011, although the positivity rate from random tests for current workers actually dropped 5.8 percent. This report from the DTI aligns with news reports that employers are having more difficulty recruiting new workers who are not drug positive. In order to gather accurate results, the DTI has been utilizing oral fluid testing instead of other forms of drug testing. Although both tests are highly effective in detecting recent drug use, collection of urine is unobserved. This allows people to potentially cheat and evade detection. In contrast, the oral fluid test requires the applicant to collect the specimen while a drug test administrator observes.

The most common drug found in the DTI urine tests is marijuana. Marijuana positives in the US workforce are around 2 percent, nearly twice that of amphetamines, the second most commonly detected drug. The use of amphetamines has also increased from 2011 by 11.7 percent while cocaine use among the US workforce has decreased 14.6 percent. Regardless of the type of drug, “Substance misuse negatively affects the workplace through lost productivity, workplace accidents and injuries, employee absenteeism, low morale and increased illness and can have a serious impact on business operations.”

Employers should be mindful of illegal drug use among new hires, but it is also important that companies distinguish between illegal and prescription drug use. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently settled with an auto parts manufacturer over a drug testing policy that required testing for all of their employees, including those who took prescription drugs. Any employee who tested positive for drugs of any kind, illegal or otherwise, was suspended from work. The generalized drug test policy eventually cost the auto parts company $750,000. Companies with an overly broad application of a drug testing policy should consider crafting a new drug policy that prohibits some prescription drug use if it interferes with actual job requirements. Likewise, companies should consider reviewing their background check policy at the same time, as the EEOC has stated that employers can no longer disqualify every potential hire simply because they have a criminal history, even if it contains a felony conviction. Companies are now required to take into account the job role when they analyze a criminal reports and make individualized assessment if they decide to reject an applicant because of their criminal history.

Although positive drug tests have risen since 2011, certain sectors, like safety-sensitive workplaces, have remained unchanged. Other sectors like home health aids have very low positive drug results as well. As long as employers do not over generalize their drug policy, these proactive tests can serve as the first line of defense against potential drug abusers getting hired. If your organization would like to implement a drug testing policy, whether for preemployment screening or for current employees, provides Drug Screening. They have more than 2000 occupational health networks across the nation, where your employees and applicants can get tested with whatever type of drug test your organization prefers to use. They also offer their US OneSEARCH tool, which instantly searches more than 450 million nationwide databases for criminal records. When used responsibly, these two tools can help you gain a better understanding of your potential and current employees.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) and cofounder of the Expungement Clearinghouse - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.