Background Checks Get Stalled by the Stroudsburg School Board

By Michael Klazema on 3/24/2013

According to state law, school board members cannot be appointed if they have certain criminal convictions on their record. Unfortunately, most schools don’t know whether or not members have criminal histories, because they are not normally a group who receives background checks. That’s why the Stroudsburg School Board has been discussing whether or not these checks should be implemented.

In order to determine whether or not a school board member has a disqualifying crime on their record, they must go through a background check. Not all board members agree that this should be done though. This week, the Stroudsburg School Board debated the issue, and the discussion grew rather heated. After much debate, they voted to table the motion. The vote to put off the discussion for another time included 5 votes to wait and 3 to move forward with a decision.

One board member, Judy Magann, believes they should have to go through the same background check process as parents in the PTA and coaches who work with children. They play a pivotal role in the lives of students and the operation of their school, and so they should be held to a high standard. Additionally, how would they be able to comply with state laws if they can’t run the needed background checks? It could make them liable if something were to happen in the future, if the involved school board member had a disqualifying crime on his or her record.

Richard Pierce, another board member, disagrees, saying board members do not have the same access to students as coaches and so should not need to go through a background check. He said he never interacts with students one-on-one. The school district’s attorney, Dan Corveleyn stated that the board could not enforce mandatory checks since the state doesn’t require them. This seems to contradict the state’s law concerning board members and criminal histories though. It seems the Stroudsburg School Board has stumbled across a loophole in the system.

Magann assured her peers that the purpose of the checks was not to remove a current member from the board, but to prevent unworthy and perhaps dangerous individuals from gaining that position. Others believe the talks have all been hypothetical and the discussions should only continue once concrete evidence has been found.

John Jakobsen is shocked why anyone would be against the idea of implementing background checks. All of them are on the school board because of their dedication to children and education, so to him, it should follow that all the members would consider the safety of those children a priority, with leaders like themselves being held accountable as well.

Specifically, the Pennsylvania Constitution states that no person with a crime that involves embezzlement, bribery, perjury, or other infamous crimes should be allowed to serve on a school board. With this, it appears the law was meant to avoid the misuse of school funds and not necessarily to prevent bodily harm from coming to the children. Still, it appears that the board will not discuss the matter again, unless someone can provide evidence that one of the members has been convicted of such an offense.

At, organizations can quickly determine which employees or volunteers have criminal convictions on their record, whether they be violent offenses or cases of fraud. With the US One SEARCH tool, they can gain access to more than 450 million criminal records across the nation. And if someone wished to be kept abreast of new criminal records after the hiring date, they can invest in the Ongoing Criminal Monitoring tool.

About - - a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) and cofounder of the Expungement Clearinghouse - serves thousands of customers nationwide, from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies by providing comprehensive screening services. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with an Eastern Operations Center in Chapin, S.C., is home to one of the largest online criminal conviction databases in the industry. For more information about backgroundchecks’ offerings, please visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.