Georgia Now Requires National Background Checks for Child Care Workers

By Michael Klazema on 5/3/2013

On May 1, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal signed a bill into law which will require national background checks for all employees that will be working with kids in Georgia child care facilities.

The bill came about in response to a case involving Macon, GA’s Progressive Christian Academy. The former owner of the academy, Betty Tolbert, alleged that the company she had turned to for assistance with the school’s financial problems defrauded her and took over ownership of the school. When Georgia officials investigated, they discovered that one of the new owners, Christina Hawkins, had a criminal record.

Hawkins’ criminal record was not detected at the time she took over Progessive Christian Academy for two reasons. First, her conviction was in Florida, and Progressive Christian Academy only ran a Georgia background check on her. Secondly, her conviction was under an alias, Christina Perera.

By using more robust background check tools, Progressive Christian Academy could have uncovered Hawkins’ criminal past beyond the state borders. For example, they could have used a tool like US OneSEARCH from, which enables employers to comb through a national database consisting of over 450 million records and instantly uncover criminal records related to the individual in question.

To uncover the alias, Progressive Christian Academy could have used US AliasSearch from This tool uses a social security trace to uncover all known aliases, including maiden names. Then, all these aliases are run through the robust US OneSearch database. This tool could have revealed the fact that Christina Hawkins, aka Christian Perera, had convictions under other names while living in Florida.

As it turned out, Hawkins was actually on parole at the time she was hired by Progressive Christian Academy. She violated her parole by lying about her new employment to her probation offices, and there was actually a warrant out for her arrest in December of 2012.

This incident made Georgia legislators realize that child care centers in the state were not performing thorough enough background checks on all employees. While Hawkins’ convictions didn’t indicate any predilection for harming or abusing children, as a felon she is still not exactly a desirable role model for or a good influence on the children at the school.

The bill, which was signed into law today, will result in better protection for children by requiring national background checks, including fingerprinting, for all child care workers. This will do a better job to detect individuals with criminal backgrounds, even if their crimes were committed in a different state or under a different name.

Georgia is just the latest in a series of states that have been passing laws mandating more rigorous background checks for employees working with children. The trend seems to be sweeping the nation, and other states may soon adopt similar legislation.


Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.