Iowa Rejects Mandatory Background Checks for Ice Cream Truck Drivers

By Michael Klazema on 5/7/2013

While many adults remember the days when it was safe for kids to roam neighborhood streets unsupervised all summer long, today’s crop of youngsters often do not have that luxury. Numerous high-profile cases relating to child abductions and child abuse have made parents and lawmakers more likely to mistrust strangers and limit their opportunities to interact with children.

One such case occurred in Iowa in the summer of 2012. Two young children, who happened to be cousins, were abducted while out riding their bikes. Their bodies were found, but the case has not been solved.

This case was on some Iowa lawmaker’s minds recently as they sought to introduce new legislation to protect children from predators. In a bid to reduce the likelihood of an offender interacting with minors, a group of Iowa Republicans attempted to mandate background checks for ice cream truck drivers in their state.

Their reasoning for the proposed mandate was that ice cream truck drivers are like “pied pipers.” The familiar tune draws kids out to the ice cream truck, where they naturally must interact with the driver in order to buy their treats. Some parents and lawmakers fear this interaction could potentially provide a predator with an opportunity to choose his next victim.

As evidence, Iowa Senator Tim Kapucian cited an incident that he said took place in Florida recently, in which an ice cream truck driver allegedly abducted and molested a child.

By requiring a background check for all ice cream drivers, the state of Iowa could screen out predators and offenders before they had a chance to interact with minors as part of their job. Legislators no doubt envisioned that, if the law passed, employers would use a tool similar to US Offender OneSEARCH. This product, which is offered by, is a thorough Offender Registry search that combs through records from every state, plus Washington DC, Guam, and Puerto Rico.

Democrats in the Iowa state legislature determined that the proposed background check measure was “flawed” and therefore did not pass it.

Of course, just because background checks are not required by law does not mean that employers should not carry them out. Performing a thorough background check on any individual that will have contact with minors as part of their job is always wise. Not only does screening out offenders with background checks protect kids, it also protects employers and companies from the backlash associated with crimes against children. No company wants their name associated with such an incident, as it can hurt their brand tremendously.

In the case of ice cream truck drivers, employers are probably already doing at least one type of background check, namely a Motor Vehicle Record Search. This type of background check is vital for any employee who will be driving as part of their job. It returns any instances of traffic violations, accidents, or driving while intoxicated.

In the end, companies should not rely on legislators to tell them how to protect their employees and customers from offenders. Instead, they should use every background check tool legally available to them to get an accurate picture of exactly who they’re hiring.


Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.