Iowa Rejects Mandatory Background Checks for Ice Cream Truck Drivers

By Michael Klazema on 5/7/2013

While many adults remember the days when it was safe for kids to roam neighborhood streets unsupervised all summer long, today’s crop of youngsters often do not have that luxury. Numerous high-profile cases relating to child abductions and child abuse have made parents and lawmakers more likely to mistrust strangers and limit their opportunities to interact with children.

One such case occurred in Iowa in the summer of 2012. Two young children, who happened to be cousins, were abducted while out riding their bikes. Their bodies were found, but the case has not been solved.

This case was on some Iowa lawmaker’s minds recently as they sought to introduce new legislation to protect children from predators. In a bid to reduce the likelihood of an offender interacting with minors, a group of Iowa Republicans attempted to mandate background checks for ice cream truck drivers in their state.

Their reasoning for the proposed mandate was that ice cream truck drivers are like “pied pipers.” The familiar tune draws kids out to the ice cream truck, where they naturally must interact with the driver in order to buy their treats. Some parents and lawmakers fear this interaction could potentially provide a predator with an opportunity to choose his next victim.

As evidence, Iowa Senator Tim Kapucian cited an incident that he said took place in Florida recently, in which an ice cream truck driver allegedly abducted and molested a child.

By requiring a background check for all ice cream drivers, the state of Iowa could screen out predators and offenders before they had a chance to interact with minors as part of their job. Legislators no doubt envisioned that, if the law passed, employers would use a tool similar to US Offender OneSEARCH. This product, which is offered by, is a thorough Offender Registry search that combs through records from every state, plus Washington DC, Guam, and Puerto Rico.

Democrats in the Iowa state legislature determined that the proposed background check measure was “flawed” and therefore did not pass it.

Of course, just because background checks are not required by law does not mean that employers should not carry them out. Performing a thorough background check on any individual that will have contact with minors as part of their job is always wise. Not only does screening out offenders with background checks protect kids, it also protects employers and companies from the backlash associated with crimes against children. No company wants their name associated with such an incident, as it can hurt their brand tremendously.

In the case of ice cream truck drivers, employers are probably already doing at least one type of background check, namely a Motor Vehicle Record Search. This type of background check is vital for any employee who will be driving as part of their job. It returns any instances of traffic violations, accidents, or driving while intoxicated.

In the end, companies should not rely on legislators to tell them how to protect their employees and customers from offenders. Instead, they should use every background check tool legally available to them to get an accurate picture of exactly who they’re hiring.


Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.

  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 

  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through