Washington State Audit Prompts Desire for Ongoing Criminal Monitoring of Child Care Workers and Foster Parents

By Michael Klazema on 5/20/2013

Officials in Washington state are calling for a “rap-back” notification system to be put in place to help them keep track of alleged criminal activities committed by workers in positions of trust. Child care workers and foster parents are the main focus at the moment, but this system could easily be expanded to include other occupations like teachers and nursing home workers.

Right now, child care workers and foster parents are required to pass criminal background checks prior to employment. However, once they pass the background check, they are essentially in the clear. No one checks up on them again, so they could potentially become involved in criminal activity with no one being the wiser.

With a “rap-back” system in place, officials would receive automatic notifications each time a worker was involved as a suspect in any sort of criminal investigation. This would help prevent embarrassing and dangerous situations, like having offenders working with children or drug abusers working in a nursing home with easy access to prescription drugs. The state could set up its own system to check workers’ records on an ongoing basis, or use a service like Ongoing Criminal Monitoring from Ongoing Criminal Monitoring enables companies to submit a worker’s name and date of birth and then have automatic monthly checks run on that individual. If new records of criminal activity are recorded, will notify the employer via email. The process is renewable in 12-month increments.

Washington state officials became interested in “rap-back” notifications after a state audit of Washington’s state-regulated and state-subsidized child care facilities and foster homes turned up some disturbing statistics. The audit revealed that 28 offenders had been living or working in state facilities between 2002 and 2012. In some cases the problem was that the supervisors at the facilities failed to notify the state of new employees or residents, while in other cases the problem was that the offenses were committed after the initial background check process had been completed.

State officials hope that initiating ongoing criminal monitoring will help keep children safe from offenders. It certainly does seem like a step in the right direction. After all, passing a background check is no guarantee of future good behavior. However, ongoing criminal monitoring or “rap-back” services provide more up-to-date information that can be used to make sure workers remain fit for employment in positions of trust.

It is telling that the “rap-back” process is intended to return criminal allegations, not just criminal convictions. When it comes to getting kids out of an unsafe situation, time is of the essence and state officials can’t always wait for the justice system to run its course. Instead, they must be proactive and review allegations will allow them to do so.

Currently Washington state is one of only 10 states that does not keep civil applicant fingerprints or use an ongoing criminal monitoring service. If the proposal for “rap-backs” is adopted, Washington state will then be following a recommendation that the federal government has been making since 2008.


Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.