Legislation and Compliance reminder: Indiana Amends the Process to Seal and Expunge Conviction Records

By Michael Klazema on 6/26/2013

The Indiana legislature significantly changed the law for the expungement process in 2013. The changes impact the eligibility of persons who have a conviction in their background. It also establishes an unlawful practice to discriminate against persons because of a sealed or expunged criminal record, and provides remedies for violations.

The Act adds Chapter 9 to Indiana Code 35-38 entitled Sealing and Expunging Conviction Records. The changes listed in this Chapter provide the eligibility requirements for the sealing or expungement of criminal records. The following persons are eligible to petition the court to seal or expunge criminal records:

1. Persons who have been arrested, if the arrest did not result in a conviction or juvenile adjudication, or it did and the conviction or adjudication was vacated on appeal. In this circumstance, records may be sealed after one year from the date of arrest.

2. Persons convicted of a misdemeanor, including a Class D felony that was reduced to a misdemeanor. Persons may petition the court to expunge these records after five years from the date of conviction, or sooner if the prosecuting attorney consents.

3. Persons convicted of a Class D felony. This provision may not apply if the Class D felony was reduced to a Class A misdemeanor. A petition may be granted to have this record expunged after eight years from the date of conviction, or sooner if the prosecuting attorney consents. This provision does not apply to elected officials, sex or violent offenders, or persons convicted of a felony that result in bodily injury to another person, perjury, or official misconduct. Other barrier crimes are listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4.

4. Persons convicted of a felony. A person may petition the court to expunge these records after eight years from the completion of the persons’ sentence. The eight year period includes the completion of a term of supervised release and the satisfaction of all other obligations placed as part of the sentence. This provision does not apply to an elected official, or a person convicted of a sex or violent crime or felony that resulted in serious bodily injury to another person. Crimes listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4 will also disqualify a person from having records expunged under the law.

5. Persons convicted of a felony including elected officials and felonies that resulted in serious bodily injury to another person. Petitions may not be filed until ten years after the completion of the person’s sentence, including the completion of any term of supervised release and the satisfaction of all other obligations placed on the person as part of the sentence. Exceptions to this section include a sex or violent offender and the crimes listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4.

The law establishes an unlawful practice in several ways if adverse action is taken against any person because of a sealed or expunged conviction or arrest record. It is now unlawful to suspend, expel, or refuse to employ a person, or to otherwise discriminate against a person for this reason. It is considered discrimination to refuse to admit, grant, or renew a license permit, or certificate necessary to engage in any activity, occupation, or profession based on sealed or expunged records. Employers are permitted to inquire about a previous criminal record only in terms that do not include the disclosure of expunged or sealed records. A person whose record is expunged must be treated as if he or she had never been convicted of the crime.

Any person who is found to have discriminated against a person in violation of this Act commits a Class C infraction and may be held in contempt of court. Other remedies provided in the Act include judicial or administrative claims, and injunctive relief. Finally, the Act prohibits the admission of an expunged record in an action for negligent hiring, admission, or licensure against an employer or other person who relied on this law.

These changes become effective July 1, 2013.

The Act may be viewed here:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.