Legislation and Compliance reminder: Indiana Amends the Process to Seal and Expunge Conviction Records

By Michael Klazema on 6/26/2013

The Indiana legislature significantly changed the law for the expungement process in 2013. The changes impact the eligibility of persons who have a conviction in their background. It also establishes an unlawful practice to discriminate against persons because of a sealed or expunged criminal record, and provides remedies for violations.

The Act adds Chapter 9 to Indiana Code 35-38 entitled Sealing and Expunging Conviction Records. The changes listed in this Chapter provide the eligibility requirements for the sealing or expungement of criminal records. The following persons are eligible to petition the court to seal or expunge criminal records:

1. Persons who have been arrested, if the arrest did not result in a conviction or juvenile adjudication, or it did and the conviction or adjudication was vacated on appeal. In this circumstance, records may be sealed after one year from the date of arrest.

2. Persons convicted of a misdemeanor, including a Class D felony that was reduced to a misdemeanor. Persons may petition the court to expunge these records after five years from the date of conviction, or sooner if the prosecuting attorney consents.

3. Persons convicted of a Class D felony. This provision may not apply if the Class D felony was reduced to a Class A misdemeanor. A petition may be granted to have this record expunged after eight years from the date of conviction, or sooner if the prosecuting attorney consents. This provision does not apply to elected officials, sex or violent offenders, or persons convicted of a felony that result in bodily injury to another person, perjury, or official misconduct. Other barrier crimes are listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4.

4. Persons convicted of a felony. A person may petition the court to expunge these records after eight years from the completion of the persons’ sentence. The eight year period includes the completion of a term of supervised release and the satisfaction of all other obligations placed as part of the sentence. This provision does not apply to an elected official, or a person convicted of a sex or violent crime or felony that resulted in serious bodily injury to another person. Crimes listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4 will also disqualify a person from having records expunged under the law.

5. Persons convicted of a felony including elected officials and felonies that resulted in serious bodily injury to another person. Petitions may not be filed until ten years after the completion of the person’s sentence, including the completion of any term of supervised release and the satisfaction of all other obligations placed on the person as part of the sentence. Exceptions to this section include a sex or violent offender and the crimes listed in Indiana Code Sections 35-42-1, 35-42-3.5, or 35-42-4.

The law establishes an unlawful practice in several ways if adverse action is taken against any person because of a sealed or expunged conviction or arrest record. It is now unlawful to suspend, expel, or refuse to employ a person, or to otherwise discriminate against a person for this reason. It is considered discrimination to refuse to admit, grant, or renew a license permit, or certificate necessary to engage in any activity, occupation, or profession based on sealed or expunged records. Employers are permitted to inquire about a previous criminal record only in terms that do not include the disclosure of expunged or sealed records. A person whose record is expunged must be treated as if he or she had never been convicted of the crime.

Any person who is found to have discriminated against a person in violation of this Act commits a Class C infraction and may be held in contempt of court. Other remedies provided in the Act include judicial or administrative claims, and injunctive relief. Finally, the Act prohibits the admission of an expunged record in an action for negligent hiring, admission, or licensure against an employer or other person who relied on this law.

These changes become effective July 1, 2013.

The Act may be viewed here:

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.