Michigan Considers Background Checks for People Adopting Pets from Shelters

By Michael Klazema on 8/2/2013

Michigan state senators are considering a proposal that would require animal shelters to run criminal background checks on everyone who applies to adopt one of their pets. The goal of the proposed legislation is to prevent individuals with histories of animal abuse from gaining access to the animals. Legislators also cited studies suggesting a link between animal and human abuse as evidence that passing the bill and reducing animal abuse would be good for everyone.

Originally, the bill proposed establishing an animal abuse offender registry, which shelters would be able to consult before giving away an animal. However, the idea of a registry was rejected as too much for the Michigan State Police to manage. As an alternative, legislators then proposed background checks. If an individual is found to have a conviction for animal abuse, they will not be permitted to adopt an animal from a shelter for at least five years. However, they could purchase an animal from a breeder as breeders will not be subject to the bill’s proposed background check requirement.

Criminal background checks are widely recognized as an important tool in protecting vulnerable groups like children, the elderly, and the disabled from individuals who might potentially abuse them. If the proposed legislation is passes, pets will also be recognized as a vulnerable group requiring protection.

While the proposal received strong support during its hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee, detractors pose reasonable doubts as to the bill’s appropriateness and effectiveness.

One issue with the proposal is that it calls for background checks to be conducted through the Michigan State Police ICHAT system. This state-based background check will only return criminal records maintained by Michigan’s Criminal Justice Center, making it possible for individuals with animal convictions in other states to slip through the cracks.

A background check tool such as US OneSEARCH from would be more effective in screening out animal abusers, because US OneSEARCH has a scope that spans jurisdictions for every state. It involves a search of over 450 million public criminal records collected from state and local databases across the country, and returns records that match a given name and date of birth. In most cases, the cost of US OneSEARCH is similar to or even less than the cost of a state-based search.

Another issue is that the bill currently includes a provision allowing for the state to foot the bill for each $10 background check conducted by an animal shelter. Detractors of the bill object to this waiving of fees in the name of economic fairness.

Ann Hier of the Michigan Association of Pure Bred Dogs came out against the bill, even though dog breeders will not be affected by the background check requirements. She said that the proposal was an overreach on the part of the state and also questioned the validity of the studies linking animal and human abuse that were cited by legislators in support of the bill.

The proposal will probably be considered by the Legislature this fall. Hopefully, it will transform again before then in order to address some of the above concerns.


Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.