Parking Enforcement Officer Hired without Criminal Background Check Writes Fake Tickets

By Michael Klazema on 8/8/2013

Reporters in Prince George’s County, Md. have been investigating the case of a parking enforcement officer who allegedly wrote $2,000 worth of fake tickets.

The officer in question, Antoine Budd, was hired in September of 2010. During his first year on the job, he wrote 4,188 parking tickets, but in 2012, he only wrote 1,879 tickets. This was the first red flag indicating that the parking enforcement officer wasn’t doing his job correctly.

Then, in June of 2013, 10 people complained that Budd had falsely issued them tickets for parking in a fire lane. Each ticket was worth $200, and all 10 were suspicious because the photos that Budd attached to them were completely black. One might assume that Budd created the false tickets because he realized that his employer was catching on to the fact that he wasn’t doing his job correctly, and he wanted to create an illusion of productivity. According to Prince George’s County Revenue Authority Director Peter Shapiro, there is no clear reason why Budd chose parking in a fire lane as the offense for his fake tickets, seeing as there is no quota system or other incentive related to issuing high-cost tickets.

Budd has been charged with 41 counts of crimes including perjury, forgery and counterfeiting, issuing false documents, and misconduct in office. The Prince George’s County Revenue Authority fired him in June.

In the course of the investigation into Budd’s criminal activities, it came out that his employer did not conduct a criminal background check on him prior to hiring. The Revenue Authority conducted what they called a “background check,” which consisted of calling personal references and former employers. They also checked his driving record and did not discover any points on Budd’s license.

Had the Revenue Authority conducted a comprehensive background check on Budd, they likely would have uncovered a lengthy history of involvement in civil, criminal, and traffic cases. Since 1995, Budd has been involved in 12 such cases, including two charges for theft, as well as charges of speeding, driving with a suspended license, and second-degree assault.

Conducting a criminal background check would have been easy, affordable, and incredibly valuable in this case. Budd’s employer could have used a national background check tool like US OneSEARCH from, which compares an individual’s name and date of birth against a collection of over 450 million public criminal records taken from state and local databases across the country.

When informed of Budd’s criminal history, Shapiro was quick to point out that the two theft charges were over 10 years old and the charges for the assault were dropped. His point seems to be that knowing the results of the background check at the time of Budd’s hiring might not have altered the county’s decision to hire him. Hiring any employee is always a leap of faith, because past behavior is not a guarantee of future behavior. However, this is no reason to skip the criminal background check.

Shapiro says that in the wake of the Budd case, his department will be reviewing their pre-employment background check policies with an eye to making checks more stringent.


Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.