Blog

 
     

backgroundchecks.com legislation and compliance update: Social Media Accounts are Off Limits in Oregon

By Michael Klazema on 8/14/2013

In May 2013, the Governor signed House Bill 2654 which relates to compelled access to social media accounts. Beginning January 1, 2014, employers in Oregon will not have access to personal social media accounts of its employees and applicants.

The new legislation defines “social media” as an electronic medium that allows users to create, share and view user-generated content, including uploading or downloading videos, still photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant messages, electronic mail or internet website profiles or locations.

The law prohibits five practices as unlawful employment practice. Employers may not:

1.    Require or request an employee or applicant to disclose or provide access to his or her personal social media account through user name, password, or other authentication means.

2.    Compel an employee or applicant to add the employer or employment agency to his or her list of contacts associated with the social media website.

3.    Compel an employee or applicant to access a personal social media account in the employer’s presence and in a manner that enables the employer to view the contents of the account that are visible only when using the account holder’s user name, password, or other authentication means.

4.    Take, or threaten to take, any adverse action if an employee refuses to disclose, or provide access to a personal social media account.

5.    Fail or refuse to hire an applicant because he or she refuses to disclose or provide access to a personal social media account, to add the employer to the list of contacts associated with the account, or view the contents of the account that are visible only when using the account holder’s user name, password, or other authentication means.

Employers are not restricted from conducting investigations to ensure compliance with laws and work-related policies. But, when doing so, employees must not be compelled to provide access to personal social media accounts. The employee may be required to share content if it is necessary for the employer to make a factual determination about a matter being investigated. Also, employees are required to disclose user name, password, or other means to access an account provided by, or on behalf of, the employer or to be used on behalf of the employer.

An employer is not liable for having private account information if it is obtained unintentionally while monitoring its network or electronic devise provided to an employee. Although, the employer may not use the information to access an employee’s personal social media account.

Nothing in the bill prohibits employers from accessing information available to the public about an employee or applicant through an online account.

 

The text of the bill is available here: http://www.leg.state.or.us/13reg/measpdf/hb2600.dir/hb2654.en.pdf

Industry News

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.