Citizen’s Petition for Background Checks on Solicitors Under Consideration in Bellingham

By Michael Klazema on 8/20/2013

This October, residents of Bellingham, Mass. will vote on a proposal to require all door-to-door solicitors to pass a background check and acquire a permit before selling goods or services in town. The proposed change to the town’s bylaws will not apply to youth groups, politicians, or religious organizations.

The proposal, which was drafted by Bellingham resident Doug Maclachan, also includes a provision limiting door-to-door sales to daytime hours, defined as 9 am to 7 pm, and an option for residents to join a “No Solicitation Registry” that will keep all salesmen off their property at all times. Maclachan said that his proposal is designed to protect residents and help them avoid unwanted knocks on their doors.

Bellingham is by no means the first or the only town to consider such measures. Many communities have recognized the risk that unscrupulous door-to-door solicitors can pose to residents. Because traveling salesmen move around frequently, they sometimes have less of an interest in providing good customer service and upholding their good name. They may sell shoddy products or services or engage in outright fraud.

Running a background check on potential solicitors can help communities protect themselves from known criminals. For example, if a previous conviction for fraud is found during a background check on a traveling salesman, this may indicate that this salesman might be likely to commit a similar crime. Communities could use a product like US OneSEARCH from in order to investigate the backgrounds of solicitors. US OneSEARCH can locate in-state and out-of-state public criminal records because it searches a collection of over 450 million criminal records taken from state and local databases across the country. This means it offers better protection than a state-based background check, which would only uncover convictions in that state’s registry.

In Bellingham’s case, it is not clear what type of background check will be conducted. Solicitors applying for a permit will be required to provide their Social Security number to local police, so the check will presumably be SSN-based. However, with the police in charge the check is likely to be state-based, not national.

Maclachan’s proposal may have some other flaws. First of all, it does not specify which types of criminal convictions should result in a denial of a permit. Additionally, it does not set a time limit for the police to complete the background check and issue a decision on an applicant’s permit status. A similar proposal from the town of Southborough was rejected by Attorney General Martha Coakley for a lack of a time limit in 2009. The provision to exempt certain groups from the background check requirement could also prevent the Attorney General from approving the proposal on the grounds that it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Town Counsel Jason Talerman said that because the proposal is a citizen’s petition, the town cannot change the proposal before the vote in order to address these concerns. Instead, they will just have to wait and see how the attorney general reacts if the measure is passed.


Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit



Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.
  • June 04 The organization, The Family Resource Center of North Mississippi (FRCNMS) was founded on the belief that families are the heart of community and that promoting healthy families leads to healthy communities. Read more about how they carefully screen and vet new employees with the help of
  • June 01 Past mistakes can have lingering effects in criminal records that appear on background checks. People with minor convictions can erase those mistakes for help starting over.