Weak Background Checks at County Fair Fail Again

By Michael Klazema on 9/10/2013

For the second time in two years, weak background checks have resulted in potentially dangerous individuals being hired to work in the “kiddie” section of Snohomish County’s Evergreen State Fair.

This year’s incident involves Dale Roy Fager, an admitted child pornography trafficker who also had a fugitive warrant out against him for forgery in the state of Indiana. Fager was able to pass the background check conducted by Butler Amusements, the contractor operating the fair for the county, by using a fake ID and an alias. He then worked for Butler Amusements for several months and traveled to many different towns and cities along the West Coast before being arrested in Monroe, Wash. based on the outstanding warrant against him.

At the time of his arrest, Fager admitted to trafficking in child pornography. Investigators discovered over 500 images on his computer, plus emails to other pedophiles discussing his desire to “molest and marry a six year old.”

Needless to say, this incident was frightening and embarrassing to county officials, especially coming on the heels of a similar incident last year. That incident involved a woman named Caitlin Ferry who was awaiting trial for charges of child molestation at the same time she was working the kids’ rides area of the fair.

County spokeswoman Bronlea Mishler said that after this year’s incident they will be taking steps to review their background check policy and use a stricter screening process.

Currently, Butler Amusements uses the National Criminal Investigative Database to check prospective fair workers for criminal convictions. This leaves potential vulnerabilities because it does not bring up arrests or pending charges, only convictions. While employers are expected to rely primarily on convictions rather than arrests in making hiring decisions, pending charges, for which guilt or innocence has not yet been determined, may need to be considered as well.

A more robust background check tool that searches multiple databases would allow employers to uncover all kinds of public criminal records and use them in a legally responsible way to make a wise hiring decision. US OneSEARCH from is a good example of such a tool. US OneSEARCH compares names and dates of birth against a collection of over 450 million public criminal records taken from all kinds of sources, including state and local court dockets across the country.

Another step the county could take is to require a Social Security Number based criminal background check such as US AliasSEARCH, which would close the loophole Faber exploited when he used a fake ID and alias to evade the background check.

While police do not believe there were any victims at the fair in Monroe, the investigation into other locations Faber visited with the fair is ongoing. Faber is currently in county jail awaiting charges.


Founded during the Internet boom in 1999 by an executive in both the staffing and information industry, – a founding member of the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS®) – has been able to create a service that provides a blend of flexible screening programs that included instant, cost effective and comprehensive solutions. Our experience in database modeling of public records information has led to become the leader in the acquisition and delivery of public records information by harnessing the power and technology of the Internet. To learn more visit



Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.