Small Connecticut Town Will Test Background Check Vendors with Next City Employee

By Michael Klazema on 11/12/2013

Normally, when it comes to background checks and employee screening processes, it’s a nervous applicant or employee who is being tested. Next time the city government hires an employee in the small town of Brooklyn, Connecticut, however, a pair of background check vendors will be competing in a test of their own.

In a rather unorthodox move, the Board of Selectman for the Connecticut town of Brooklyn—a small town with a population of less than 10,000 and not to be confused with the New York City borough—has decided to make the background check for its next city government employee a double-edged sword to assess both applicant and background check provider. The Connecticut town is considering two vendors as it moves toward establishing more substantial employee screening processes for local government positions. Both entities charge roughly the same amount for a basic background check, and city officials plan to have both companies prepare a background check for the city’s next employee. Whichever company prepares the “better” background check report will win the allegiance of the town government, and theoretically, will be contracted for all town employment screenings in the future.

Beyond the headline-catching double background check testing plan, the news out of Brooklyn, Connecticut is significant because it indicates just how prevalent thorough employee screening processes are becoming. Brooklyn, like many small towns throughout the United States, is a small and trusting community where background checks, even for government employees, have never been notably enforced.

But news of shootings, theft, and untrustworthy employees in off-the-beaten-path cities has left even America’s smallest towns calling for background checks. In Brooklyn, the call came over the summer, after a group of residents submitted a petition to the town government asking the Recreation Department employees—workers who commonly interact with children—be background checked prior to employment. That petition led to one of the background check vendors that the town will soon test, and encouraged the government to consider background checks or drug screening measures for other municipal sectors.

The story in Brooklyn, Connecticut may well indicate where most American small towns are headed. Before long, it is likely that all government employees—federal, statewide, and local—will be beholden to background checks, and thorough screening measures are becoming popular for private entities as well. For that reason, companies like are becoming more and more relevant. The ability to search over 450 million criminal records instantly, as allows with services like the US OneSEARCH check, is now a vital component in building a comprehensive background check that does limit the search to the town or state border. Every employer these days, from high-profile corporate entities to local small business owners, needs to be able to check the backgrounds of their applicants, and easy-to-use web services like and a comprehensive list of background check products are key decision points for human resource departments to consider in selecting their next vendor.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.