Government-Paid Childcare Workers Not Being Properly Background Checked

By Michael Klazema on 11/14/2013

The Child Care and Development Fund was initially designed with the goal of helping low-income American families afford daycare services, nannies, and other childcare support, but according to a recent article from the Washington Free Beacon, the Child Care and Development Fund may not be doing proper background checks on the employees it works with.

The Free Beacon article states that the Child Care and Development Fund—a program managed through the Administration for Children and Families—uses some $5.2 billion in government funding each year to help support needy families in all 50 states, as well as in Washington D.C. The organization’s mission is simple: give parents a way to care for their children without requiring them to miss out on work hours. However, if background checks for such government-paid childcare workers are not being administered in a thorough fashion, it is likely that parents will think twice before using them in the future.

Not that the Administration for Children and Families is completely turning a blind eye to past criminal behavior. 15 States were found to be performing suitable background checks. The rest of the states, meanwhile, were following the administration’s background screening guidelines, which dictate that a “thorough” background check involves looking at state and national registries of known child abusers.

While criminal record registry screenings and child abuse checks obviously go a long way in clearing an employee for hands-on childcare duties, they don’t cover all types of sources that track dangerous criminal behavior. For instance, most states were not screening Child Care and Development Fund employees with a sex offender registry search. The core database search offered by includes a search of offender registries from all 50 states and can be run instantly. Considering the sensitive nature of the work promoted by the Administration for Children and Families and the Child Care and Development Fund, it is a bit alarming that most of their employees are not required to undergo a sex offender registry check.

Unsurprisingly, the Administration for Children and Families is now proposing a “more stringent” set of employment regulations, included more thorough criminal background checks and full clearance checks of sex offender registries. Still, the fact that states have not always required childcare workers to undergo sex offender checks has proven alarming to many parents throughout the country, and may now lead to a call for more sweeping legislation regarding childcare services.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.
  • June 04 The organization, The Family Resource Center of North Mississippi (FRCNMS) was founded on the belief that families are the heart of community and that promoting healthy families leads to healthy communities. Read more about how they carefully screen and vet new employees with the help of
  • June 01 Past mistakes can have lingering effects in criminal records that appear on background checks. People with minor convictions can erase those mistakes for help starting over. 
  • May 29 The city of Greenley, Colorado has added background checks and new affidavits to its process for screening candidates for city council. The new measures come after a candidate with a felony conviction for forgery got elected as city councilman.