Montana Considers Universal Background Checks for School Bus Drivers

By Michael Klazema on 12/9/2013

The Montana Office of Public Instruction is currently in the process of drafting new legislation that would require every school district in the state to conduct criminal background checks on their bus drivers prior to employment.

Many districts in the state already have significant employment screening processes in place for both bus drivers and teachers, as both positions give employees frequent close contact with children. However, an audit last spring called the state’s employment screening policies into question for bus drivers, finding that eight bus drivers in the state had records of some sort of undisclosed “moral conduct” that rendered their employment questionable. The audit indicated that the same instances of “immoral conduct” would not have been allowed to pass for state teachers, and therefore should not be ignored for bus drivers either.

The audit looked at records of all active school bus drivers in the state, a number that totals 1,435. Out of that 1,435, eight is at least a fairly miniscule percentage—0.557 percent, to be exact—but has still encouraged the Montana Office of Public Instruction to call for tighter employment restrictions for bus drivers.

The Office of Public Instruction’s plan for revamping bus driver background checks would demand that school districts run full background checks on bus driver applicants. However, according to a report from, a local news source based in Kalispell, Montana, the people of the Montana Association of School Boards have their own ideas for how to implement stronger bus driver screening.

The school board association insisted that bus drivers could go through a two-pronged check for maximum effectiveness. The first step would take place at the state level, when prospective bus drivers apply with the state to get their commercial driver’s license. As far as the Montana Association of School Boards is concerned, this stage would be the perfect place for the state’s Department of Justice to step in and conduct a thorough criminal background check.

A driver who passed the state criminal check would then go on to apply for specific jobs with specific school districts, which would then be beholden to look further into that driver’s background before approving their employment. For instance, the school district could check the driver’s employment history, as well as references and education, to get a better sense of who that person is as a professional., for instance, has services that look into both criminal histories and professional or educational histories—both types of background checks that are valuable to run on prospective employees.

Whether or not the Office of Public Instruction will heed the Montana Association of School Boards’ advice will be revealed in January, when the bus driver background check proposal goes before the state’s Board of Public Education.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.