New Orleans Mayor Makes a Push to Make His City the Next to Embrace “Ban the Box” Policies

By Michael Klazema on 12/10/2013

Proposals to “ban the box” asking questions about previous criminal history as part of job applications have proven to be arguably the biggest trend in the employment screening world throughout 2012 and 2013. The governors of states like Minnesota and Rhode Island signed legislation earlier this year that made “ban the box” policies a requirement throughout their states, both for government employers and private businesses.

Meanwhile, cities in states where “ban the box” legislation has not yet been presented are making their own moves toward establishing what they believe to be a fairer and more ethical employment standard. For instance, Philadelphia added citywide “ban the box” legislation in May 2012, also for both private and public employers. Now, Louisiana’s New Orleans is making a move to follow in the footsteps of countless other states, cities, and counties throughout the country. On November 18, Mayor Mitch Landrieu presented a “ban the box” bill proposal to the New Orleans Civil Service Commission that would require the criminal conviction checkbox to be removed from all city job applications.

Unlike the “ban the box” policies currently active in Minnesota, Rhode Island, Philadelphia, and many other cities and states around the country, Mayor Landrieu’s proposal would only demand the amendment of job applications for public employment. Private businesses in New Orleans would still have the choice of whether or not to continue asking about criminal convictions on job applications.

However, the proposed New Orleans “ban the box” policy would have much in common with the policies currently in place elsewhere. As with other “ban the box” legislation, a New Orleans-wide decision to not ask about criminal history on a job application would hardly equate to a lack of employment screening. On the contrary, the legislation states that applicants would be screened first based on employment history, education, and other elements of merit. The candidate determined to be the best fit for the job would then receive an employment offer and would have to pass a full background check to actually be hired.

If the post-interview background check uncovered a history of criminal convictions, the city would then have to determine whether or not the nature and severity of the crimes impacted the applicant’s ability to perform the job. Since applicants making it all the way to the background check stage will have otherwise proven their viability as impressive candidates, Mayor Landrieu hopes that the new “ban the box” system would help to diminish the discrimination that many ex-criminals face in the workplace.

For example, an applicant with a history of DUI charges would still likely be denied employment if the job in question involved driving. However, an administrative applicant with a single 20-year-old drug charge would stand a much greater chance at being hired than they do with current city policies.

According to an article on, Mayor Landrieu had an ace in the hole when it came to presenting his cause to the New Orleans Civil Service Commission. That “ace” was Lenard Veal, a man who spent seven months in jail 20 years ago for selling cocaine. Now, Veal is licensed in both insurance and private security through the state of Louisiana, and has built a rewarding life out of mentoring kids. Still, his decades-old criminal conviction has long kept him out of serious employment consideration in his preferred careers.

Playing the role of the ex-criminal who deserves a second chance, Veal enchanted the Service Commission, which deferred its decision on Landrieu’s “ban the box” legislation, but which also indicated to that it would approve the proposal once the Mayor determined how the background checks would work and who would execute them. The checks would likely involve both state and nationwide criminal searches, as well as checks of offender registries and warrant lists and Social Security Number validation, all of which are offered through


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.