New Jersey Takes “Ban the Box” One Step Further with New Background Check Bill

By Michael Klazema on 12/18/2013

State governments throughout the country have taken 2013 as an opportunity to “ban the box” and require the removal of any questions about criminal history from job applications. Up until now, New Jersey has remained mostly silent in the ban the box argument. But rather than be late to the party on that particular provision, New Jersey’s Assembly Labor Committee has now gone one step further.

The committee last week voted to approve a bill that would prohibit employers from running background checks on their applicants until they are ready to make a job offer. In other words, the entire job screening process would run its course – from application to phone interview and finally to in-person interview – with employers having little to no insight into an applicant’s criminal record. When the employer has chosen the most qualified or otherwise impressive applicant, he or she would then be allowed to make a job offer conditional on the outcome of a criminal background check.

While New Jersey currently has no “ban the box” legislation in place, and while this new bill will make no changes to which questions employers can and cannot ask on a job application, the background check law would serve essentially the same purpose. Proponents of the bill have used the same arguments as supporters of “ban the box” or expungement laws. The arguments are still good ones, about how former criminals with years of good behavior and clean records are still being punished by prospective employers for a crime they committed decades ago, and how ex-convicts who have turned their lives around need to be given a second chance if they are truly going to overcome their previous offenses.

By not allowing employers to run a background check until they have chosen their ideal applicant, the New Jersey bill would hope to break the cycle of businesses writing off qualified individuals simply because of a single black mark on their records. It would also encourage employers to more closely consider the offense in question in light of the job to be performed. In other words, it would be a means of fighting blanket discrimination against ex-convicts in the workplace.

However, businesses throughout the state – as well as the Republican members of the Assembly Labor Committee – worry that the bill would hinder the ability of employers to protect their businesses, their customers, their property, and their other employees from potentially dangerous hires. For instance, the bill could slow down hiring processes for businesses that like to screen multiple applicants – and look into multiple backgrounds at once.

In the case of a convicted criminal making it to the final stage of the screening process, employers could offer that individual the job, run the background check, deem the applicant unfit for the role, and then have to go back to square one of the interview process. At worst, the bill could result in wasted  time by actively withholding relevant information until the last minute. Additionally, employers choosing to turn away applicants thanks to a criminal record would likely feel compelled to explain the decision in details– a bureaucratic step that many busy employers won’t like.

While there is certainly something to be said for fighting the discrimination against ex-convicts in the employment circuit, simple “ban the box” policies may be a better way of doing it than New Jersey’s more restrictive background check bill. Screenings for criminal history, sex offender status, and other offenses – all screening options that are available through – are an important steps for any employer to take in order to protect themselves and their business. By not allowing employers to run background checks earlier in the screening process, New Jersey may be making a move that will diminish hiring productivity.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 11 The Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General criticized a migrant youth detention center on the border for not running the proper background checks. Federal law requires the facility to screen all employees with FBI fingerprint checks.
  • December 06 In a bid to combat money laundering and illicit funding sources for terrorists flowing through the country's real estate sector, Singapore's government now mandates background checks for buyers purchasing properties prior to development.
  • December 04 What is a reference check? How does it vary from a work history check? We explore these questions and others.
  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 For hiring managers to verify the information provided on a resume, verification is essential.  Such is the purpose of employment history background checks.
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 21

    Verification checks are a powerful way to assess how truthful a job candidate has been on his or her application or resume. These checks can verify work history, education verification, professional licenses, and favorable personal qualities.