Massachusetts Senator Calls for Ban on Pre-Employment Credit Checks

By Michael Klazema on 12/19/2013

In the process of looking into a job applicant’s criminal background, many employers will also run a routine check of that person’s credit record. Especially for jobs involving finance planning or the handling of a business’s money, knowing whether or not a person is good with handling their own money can be of pivotal importance to an employer. Just as employers have a right to know whether or not they are hiring a convicted criminal, many in the background check industry have argued that employers also have a right to know a prospective employee’s history with credit and money.

Elizabeth Warren, a United States senator from Massachusetts, disagrees with that argument. In fact, Warren is so vehemently against pre-employment credit checks that she has introduced legislation that could signal the death knell for credit checks in the employment screening process. The bill, called “the Equal Employment for All Act,” argues that credit history consideration in the employment screening process is a way for hiring managers to discriminate against the poor, not a way for employers to determine who is and who is not responsible with money.

Warren and her democratic coalition in the Senate believe that, far from just being a sign of irresponsibility, bad credit can have a range of causes. The Massachusetts senator pointed out that, while bad credit can be caused by someone making impulse purchases or living beyond his or her means, it can also come as a result of “unexpected medical costs, unemployment, economic downturns, or other bad breaks.” The Equal Employment for All Act was written with the goal of preventing job searchers who have suffered from such occurrences from being discriminated against by hiring managers.

The new bill certainly has a deep well of support to draw from: since the 2008 economic downturn, poor credit scores have become increasingly more frequent. Now, Warren argues that someone with bad credit and no job can easily find himself or herself in a frustrating catch 22. The kind of person Warren’s bill is trying to help is someone who can’t pay his bills because he doesn’t have a job, but can’t find employment because he can’t pay his bills and therefore has poor credit history. The solution? For Warren, it’s to ban credit checks in the workplace.

Still, even as the Equal Employment for All Act gathers bipartisan support, it is likely that certain employers – especially those that recruit for financially sensitive positions – will oppose the bill. Credit reports, like those offered through, can offer insight into applicant’s debts, bad financial decisions, and other financial red flags, all of which can influence a hiring decision.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.