Blog

 
     

New Year Brings New Background Check Laws to Numerous States

By Michael Klazema on 1/1/2014

It’s a new year, and that means that new background check legislation has officially gone into effect all over the country. Often when new employment screening laws – or for that matter, any laws – are proposed and approved, they are given an official start date of January 1st. Now that January 2014 is upon us, several states are experiencing notable changes to their background check policies for the first time in months.

For instance, Minnesota has become the latest state to add “Ban the Box” legislation to its state law books. Following in the footsteps of several other states and cities, the Minnesota “Ban the Box” law will seek to give ex-criminals a second chance in landing employment. As with other “Ban the Box” legislation, the new Minnesota policy will prohibit employers from asking questions pertaining to criminal history on initial job applications.

The goal of the legislation is to give people with criminal records an opportunity to land job interviews, get face-to-face time with prospective employers, and better “state their case” for employment. Proponents of the law hope that it will help ex-convicts to build new lives after prison and to avoid falling back into old criminal habits. In addition, the bill views the hiring of people with criminal records as an essential economic action, citing the country’s aging workforce as an issue that will soon call for a wider applicant pool. With 92 million Americans currently possessing a criminal record of some sort, Minnesota thinks that employers no longer have the luxury of rejecting applicants on the basis of a single 20-year-old offense or a petty, nonviolent crime.

Minnesota’s decision to join the “Ban the Box” bandwagon is big news for the background check industry, as many other states will likely follow suit with their own variation on the law in the coming year. (Rhode Island also has “Ban the Box” legislation that went into effect on January 1st, 2014.) However, other states also have background check legislation taking effect with the New Year, such as Georgia, where a new law will now require childcare workers to submit to a federal fingerprint background check prior to employment. Previously, Georgia has only required state background checks, which run the risk of missing major criminal offenses if they took place in other states. Since daycare workers are consistently put in close contact with young children, state background checks simply do not provide adequate protection or security.

The new law, which will require all incoming and existing childcare workers to undergo a federal check, will more fully flesh out Georgia’s childcare security standards. Background checks for incoming applicants switched over on January 1st. Existing employees, meanwhile, have until 2017 to complete the federal fingerprint background check. That’s a long time, and it’s likely that criminals who have managed to avoid detection within Georgia’s childcare system so far will attempt to put off their checks for as long as possible. However, while the new law won’t completely secure the Georgia childcare industry right away, it is a step in the right direction for keeping kids safe.

Sources: http://www.gpb.org/news/2014/01/01/new-year-brings-stricter-background-checks-for-georgias-child-care-workers

http://www.publicnewsservice.org/2013-12-31/social-justice/a-second-chance-for-former-mn-inmates-looking-for-work/a36582-1


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.