Department of Justice Accuses Private Contractor of Faking 665,000 Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 1/23/2014

On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Edward Snowden, the man who leaked thousands of pages of sensitive National Security Agency documents to the press and the public last summer, answered questions regarding the motivations behind the leaks. Snowden’s actions revealed numerous NSA spying programs and breaches of citizens’ constitutional rights, igniting controversy in government sectors. However, now, the government is insisting that Snowden should not have been given clearance to NSA records in the first place, and that his employment was a mistake caused in part by a faulty background check.

In fact, the federal government is accusing USIS, the firm that vetted Edward Snowden and countless other government employees – including Aaron Alexis, the man who killed 12 others in a Washington navy yard shooting last fall – of delivering phony background check reports. On Wednesday evening, January 22, the Department of Justice filed a massive lawsuit against USIS, claiming that the private firm had faked approximately 665,000 background checks between 2008 and 2012. Filed in the United States District Court of Alabama, the lawsuit contends that USIS knowingly delivered faulty and incomplete background checks to boost its own revenues, breaching its contract with the government over half a million times, and effectively swindling American taxpayers out of “tens of millions of dollars.”

More specifically, the lawsuit claims that USIS participated in a process called “dumping” or “flushing,” which involved the use of software that automatically marked a vast number of cases and employee records as “Review Complete” before delivering them back to the United States Office of Personnel Management. In turn, the OPM took these bogus reviews to mean that the employees in question had been cleared for duty, giving security clearance to people who probably should have been kept outside of the government system. In their defense, USIS upper management has argued that the “dumping” scheme was something that was carried out – without management approval – by a fringe group of employees. USIS has also stated that anyone involved in the scheme has been terminated and is no longer working for the company.

Regardless of whether or not the perpetrators behind the dumping scheme are still working for USIS, the company is undoubtedly in big trouble. Supposedly, neither Snowden’s check nor Alexis’s were among the fraudulently dumped cases. Still, 665,000 others were, and that number of skipped fingerprint screenings and other background investigations would be a massive liability under any circumstance. With the Department of Justice claiming a pile of evidence – including damning emails sent within the organization – and a USIS whistleblower working to help bring the company down, the government 's case appears strong.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.