Department of Justice Accuses Private Contractor of Faking 665,000 Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 1/23/2014

On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Edward Snowden, the man who leaked thousands of pages of sensitive National Security Agency documents to the press and the public last summer, answered questions regarding the motivations behind the leaks. Snowden’s actions revealed numerous NSA spying programs and breaches of citizens’ constitutional rights, igniting controversy in government sectors. However, now, the government is insisting that Snowden should not have been given clearance to NSA records in the first place, and that his employment was a mistake caused in part by a faulty background check.

In fact, the federal government is accusing USIS, the firm that vetted Edward Snowden and countless other government employees – including Aaron Alexis, the man who killed 12 others in a Washington navy yard shooting last fall – of delivering phony background check reports. On Wednesday evening, January 22, the Department of Justice filed a massive lawsuit against USIS, claiming that the private firm had faked approximately 665,000 background checks between 2008 and 2012. Filed in the United States District Court of Alabama, the lawsuit contends that USIS knowingly delivered faulty and incomplete background checks to boost its own revenues, breaching its contract with the government over half a million times, and effectively swindling American taxpayers out of “tens of millions of dollars.”

More specifically, the lawsuit claims that USIS participated in a process called “dumping” or “flushing,” which involved the use of software that automatically marked a vast number of cases and employee records as “Review Complete” before delivering them back to the United States Office of Personnel Management. In turn, the OPM took these bogus reviews to mean that the employees in question had been cleared for duty, giving security clearance to people who probably should have been kept outside of the government system. In their defense, USIS upper management has argued that the “dumping” scheme was something that was carried out – without management approval – by a fringe group of employees. USIS has also stated that anyone involved in the scheme has been terminated and is no longer working for the company.

Regardless of whether or not the perpetrators behind the dumping scheme are still working for USIS, the company is undoubtedly in big trouble. Supposedly, neither Snowden’s check nor Alexis’s were among the fraudulently dumped cases. Still, 665,000 others were, and that number of skipped fingerprint screenings and other background investigations would be a massive liability under any circumstance. With the Department of Justice claiming a pile of evidence – including damning emails sent within the organization – and a USIS whistleblower working to help bring the company down, the government 's case appears strong.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.