Texas Requires Healthcare “Navigators” to Submit to Criminal Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 1/29/2014

In one of the more surprising background check trends to come along in the past few years, the United States government last fall launched its federalized healthcare plan, the Affordable Care Act (known in most circles as Obamacare), employing a slew of people to help operate the system, but failing to run criminal background checks on many of them. The workers in question, referred to by President Obama and throughout the media as “healthcare navigators,” are meant to help citizens from all over the country “navigate” the online Obamacare system and enroll in healthcare plans.

The system is a complicated one, a marketplace exchange of sorts where users are given all manner of different healthcare insurance companies and policies to choose from. Believing correctly that many would be overwhelmed by the online system, the federal government swiftly hired tens of thousands of navigators to advise people on which healthcare policies would best suit their unique needs. However, without background checks, those same navigators could become more of a dangerous liability than a friendly help. When called to help a citizen with the health insurance system, a navigator is given automatic access to that person’s sensitive personal information, including their name, address, social security number, and more. In other words, the navigator position is an identify thief’s dream job.

To make matters worse, there is no federal requirement or mandate that insists on criminal background checks for navigators, meaning that dangerous and untrustworthy employees could slip through the cracks. The lack of criminal background checks is a major oversight that has led many journalists, politicians, and private citizens to believe that the Obama Administration pushed the Affordable Care Act into effect before the online exchange system was ready.

That belief is shared by the Texas state government, which recently approved a new law that will require all healthcare navigators working inside the state to submit to full criminal background checks prior to being given access to sensitive customer information. In addition to background checks and identity confirmation tests, the new measure – approved by the Texas Department of Insurance – will also mandate that navigators receive extra training to serve within the state of Texas.

John Corwyn, a United States Republican Senator from Texas, had some choice words for the federal government’s botched handling of the healthcare system. In a statement published following the successful adoption of the new Texas background check measures, Corwyn said he was proud of Texas for “taking the steps” that the federal department of Health and Human Services have thus far neglected to take. He expressed his belief that any employees paid for with taxpayer money – a collective group to which healthcare navigators belong – should be subject to background checks. The fact that navigators are given access to sensitive customer information, Corywn argued, only makes the pre-employment screening process that much more important.

Texas is not the only state that has proposed criminal background check restrictions for healthcare navigators, and will undoubtedly not be the last to sign such restrictions into law. As more citizens are made aware that their information is at the fingertips of potentially unsavory people, the outcry calling for state and nationwide criminal background checks will likely grow. State governments may also be wise to implement social security validation checks – screening tests available through – in order to sniff out potential fraudsters or identity thieves.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.