Washington D.C. Fire Department Mandates Sweeping Employee Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 1/30/2014

The Washington D.C. fire department is one of those organizations that runs background checks on its applicants at hiring time, but then moves to an honor system regarding its current employees. In other words, the department doesn’t typically require its employees to complete repeat background checks, asking instead that firemen and other department workers report any new instances of arrest or criminal conviction to human resources. Unfortunately though, fire department officials have indicated that this self-reporting honor system has not been working as intended. Numerous members of the department have been arrested in recent months, and only a small percentage of those run-ins with the law have been reported in accordance with department policy.

Now, Kenneth Ellerbe – the city fire chief – is taking drastic measures to address the issues of dishonesty and crime that are currently running rampant in the department. Ellerbe has issued a special mandate that will require the department’s 1,800 “operational” employees to submit to comprehensive criminal background checks. The chief has also given department members an ultimatum of sorts: report any recent arrests, driver’s license suspensions, or criminal convictions within the next 10 days, or face termination if and when those offenses turn up on a background check.

Ellerbe’s statement to employees said that the fire department would use “all legally authorized methods of review” to uncover any undisclosed instances of criminal history within the agency. The checks will apply mostly to field workers – including employees who man fire trucks or ambulances – and will exempt most department desk workers. The statement also warns that any unreported crimes or arrests could be grounds for termination or other disciplinary action, but specifically names vehicle-related offenses – particularly DUI or DWI citations – as points of focus.

The background-check mandate and the department’s decidedly stern warning to employees may seem surprising, but given recent events, something like this was inevitable. Reports indicate that at least 11 Washington D.C. firefights have been arrested in the last three or four months, for a range of offenses. The most recent arrest allegedly involved a firefighter who was caught driving under the influence of alcohol. That particular firefighter was also cited for illegally carrying a firearm in his vehicle. A series of similar crimes – especially if left unreported – could serve as a major blow to the D.C. fire department’s overall integrity, hence Ellerbe’s sweeping decision to run repeat background checks on operational employees.

This isn’t the first time that Washington’s fire department has vowed to run background checks on current employees. In 2007, the department’s former chief proposed a policy for periodic repeat background checks, after accusations were raised that certain department employees may have been running an illegal prostitution business out of city firehouses. Rubin succeeded in implementing regular repeat background checks for a time, but it only took a few years for the department to revert to its old ways of running background screenings only on incoming employees. Typically, the only current employees that have received consistent repeat background checks are those who have been posted to oversee the presidential inauguration. Beyond that, most employees haven’t been background checked since they were vetted as part of their initial application process.

At very least, it seems the agency could gain a lot from a fast-acting ongoing criminal monitoring system, such as’s service offered in conjunction with US OneSEARCH product.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.