Lawsuit Against Canon over Background Checks is Dismissed

By Michael Klazema on 10/7/2014

In 2012, Anya McPherson was working as a temporary data entry clerk for Canon Solutions America (known at the time as Canon Business Solutions). In April of that year, the company approached McPherson asking her to apply for a more permanent position with the company. She got the job but shortly afterward was informed, via a phone call from human resources, that she had failed her background check. The routine background screening had uncovered a 12-year-old felony in McPherson's past. The same day she received the call, McPherson was also terminated from her position.

McPherson ended up filing a class action lawsuit against Canon, citing the illegal and improper use of background checks that had led to her termination from the company. McPherson claimed that Canon had violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by not providing her with a copy of the background check report used to make the firing decision. The company also did not furnish McPherson with the information on the company that had run the background check, which she would have been able to use to obtain a free report. As a result, McPherson says that she was never given a chance to dispute the findings of the background check report.

In addition to the simple illegality of the FRCA violations, McPherson believes that she would not had been fired by Canon had the company given her a chance to explain. It is not clear from news materials precisely what sort of felony charge McPherson had on her record that lost her the job with Canon. However, the plaintiff has claimed repeatedly that, if Canon had gone through the proper channels with her background check, she would have been able to point out that her offense was eligible for expungement. Whether McPherson has had her felony records expunged since her departure from Canon is also unclear.

Now, the class action suit looks like it is officially coming to an end. McPherson, her lawyers, and their class appear to have come to a mutually agreeable out-of-court settlement for the case, and the lawsuit is being dismissed. Still, there's a lesson to be learned here, not just for employers, but for job seekers as well. The first lesson is that companies, both big and small, need to follow the FCRA to the letter of the law. Long, drawn-out legal battles like the one between McPherson and Canon are costly, not just monetarily but also to a company's reputation.

Secondly, employees or job searchers need to remember to be vigilant and truthful about their history. While McPherson might have eligible to have her felony expunged, she didn't go through the process of doing so before an employer found it and she had to face consequences. On the job application for the permanent position at Canon, records show that McPherson checked "no" when asked if she had a criminal record. Since her felony was not sealed or expunged at the time, McPherson answered that question dishonestly. It's a reminder to ex-offenders that "eligibility" does not equal "expungement." If you want to find out if your record is eligible for expungement, visit


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.

  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 

  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through