Does Tinder Need Criminal Background Checks for Users?

By Michael Klazema on 10/13/2014

In recent years, it's become increasingly common for online dating sites to do background checks on their users. Even with sites that don't have background check policies, users often do their own research or background checks prior to connecting in person with someone they met online. Such shows of constant vigilance help keep users of these online dating platforms safe from potential predators. But with the rise of Tinder, a dating service that connects users through a free mobile app, questions of background checks in online dating are again coming to the forefront.

The furor of the discussion has been exacerbated by a recent incident where a New Zealand woman was sexually assaulted and gang raped after meeting in person with a man she found on Tinder. She met the man at a restaurant in Sydney, and then went with him to a bar where they met up with his friends. At the bar, the woman was drugged, after which she was sexually assaulted by her date and at least two of his friends.

Tinder has said they are saddened by the incident, but refused to take responsibility for what happened. Instead, Tinder said that users have to use caution when interacting with people they meet through the app, especially if in-person meetings are taking place. In other words, Tinder thinks it is completely a user's responsibility to judge whether or not meeting up with someone they met through the service is safe.

To a certain extent, Tinder is right: users have to realize that people may not always be as they seem online or through text messages. However, as Tinder grows and becomes more popular thanks to a sizable base of users, the service also has a responsibility to make sure that no harm comes to those users. This could be done with similar strategies to what dating websites like and eHarmony use. Such sites run quick name-based background checks on possible clients to make sure that they don't have histories of violence or records filled with sexual offenses.

It's true that part of the appeal of Tinder is that anyone can download the app and immediately start connecting with other "interesting people." However, it's also true that the nature of the app also makes it a helpful tool for predators searching for new victims. Tinder needs to be aware of this fact and needs to take steps to make sure those predators don't run freely on the service. It appears that the recent incident in Sydney has not convinced the company of that fact, but it should at least wake users up to the risks of meeting up with people they connect with on Tinder.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.