Blog

 
     

Maryland Considers Background Checks for Doctors

By Michael Klazema on 11/3/2014

According to a recent report from the Baltimore Sun, the Maryland Board of Physicians is in talks to propose new legislation for doctor background checks in the state. Interestingly, such a law is not already on the books in Maryland.

The legislative proposal that the Maryland Board of Physicians is considering has been in development since this summer, and would require all doctors working in the state to undergo criminal background checks. All physicians would have to pass a background check in order to earn a license to practice within Maryland, while the legislation would also stipulate periodic repeat checks for already-licensed doctors.

The inspiration for the legislation came earlier this year, when a Maryland doctor was accused of sexually assaulting an urgent care patient. The doctor had been practicing medicine in Maryland for the better part of two decades, and had even been a family practice physician in Catonsville.

After he was accused of assault, it came to light that the doctor had a serious criminal conviction on his record, from a 1987 case in which he raped a woman at gunpoint. The man was sentences to 10 years in prison for the crime, a sentence for which he only served four years before being released for good behavior. By 1996, he was in Maryland working as a doctor.

The man has since surrendered his license to practice medicine, a concession for which criminal investigators have agreed to drop charges in the recent sexual assault case. However, while this particular predator of a doctor may be out of the medical practice picture, at least in Maryland,he root of the problem still exists: a lack of background checks for doctors in the state.

The Baltimore Sun says that Maryland is one of 13 states that still do not require background checks for practicing doctors. Strangely, many other workers in the healthcare sphere, including nurses, therapists, and others, are required to go through background checks in Maryland. Those rules just don't apply to doctors.

And while the state board does ask physicians to disclose arrests or criminal convictions on their applications for licenses to practice, that doesn't necessarily mean that all doctors are honest about their pasts. The aforementioned doctor, for instance, only disclosed that he had assaulted someone; he didn't admit that the assault in question was rape with threat of a deadly weapon, and it's difficult to believe that the state would have licensed him with knowledge of such a crime.

As a result of all of this, the Maryland Board of Physicians is pushing for legislation that would make background checks a licensing requirement in the state. The measure is expected to garner a lot of support, and will likely ultimately end up being law.

The question, then, is why it took so long for something like this to become law. Why aren't we making sure that the people most trusted with our healthcare are trustworthy individuals? Why is there a double standard where nurses have to go through background checks to be licensed, but doctors to not? Why aren't hospitals and clinics doing their own background checks to make sure that no dangerous individuals are working within their walls? The thought that there is even one state without background checks for doctors is frightening; the fact that there are 13 states without that requirement is simply inexcusable.

Source:http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/bs-hs-doctor-background-checks-20141029-story.html


Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.