Lag Times Hampers Background Check Effectiveness in Connecticut School District

By Michael Klazema on 11/10/2014

On the surface, it looks as if Glastonbury Public Schools, a school district located in Glastonbury, Connecticut, has fairly standard employee screening policies. As part of the application process, all teachers and other workers employed by the school district have to be fingerprinted and background checked. The fingerprints are checked by both the state police and by the FBI, all in search of criminal or sex offender histories that may make an applicant unfit to serve in an educational environment.

Sounds safe, right? Indeed, under optimal circumstances, a background check policy like the one maintained by Glastonbury Public Schools would be more than adequate for keeping students safe. But what about less-than-perfect circumstances? Specifically, what about lag times in state and FBI fingerprint checks that force the district to jump the gun with hiring decisions?

Such was the case recently in Glastonbury, when a man was hired to a paraprofessional technology position before his fingerprint background check results cleared. Soon after his summer hiring date, the man was arrested for allegedly stealing iPads and other electronic devices from the school district. The twist? His background check report didn't arrive until the day he was arrested. When that happened, the district learned that he had a criminal record, had served jail time in the past, and had a documented problem with heroin addiction.

Did the school district fail to do its due diligence here? Should they have waited for the man's background check reports to come back before offering him a job? Did they put students in danger by not waiting? These questions and others were undoubtedly asked in Glastonbury after the tech paraprofessional was arrested. The issue, though, is that there are no easy answers.

Because of the lag times inherent in state and FBI fingerprint checks, the Glastonbury school district consistently faces a dilemma when it comes to making hiring decisions. On one hand, it's important to run the background checks and make sure employees are safe and trustworthy.

On another hand, FBI background checks typically take two months, which is an absurd amount of time for anyone to wait to hear whether or not they got a job. If the school district were to wait that length of time, they would risk losing interested and qualified candidates. Add the fact that many vacant school positions have to be filled swiftly, to avoid disruptions to student learning, and it's easy to see that Glastonbury Public Schools was in a tight spot when it came to this particular employee screening process.

Is there a solution? Quicker background checks. FBI fingerprint screenings are thorough, but they take a long time, and no employer should risk hiring someone who they haven't screened thoroughly. Something like US OneSEARCH, an instant nationwide screening option offered by, could be a worthy compromise in a situation like this. OneSEARCH combs through over 500 million records, culled from every state and territory in the country.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.