Ohio Home Health Worker Indicted on Rape Charges Had Previous History of Assault

By Michael Klazema on 12/4/2014

Officials with the Ohio Department of Health say that the rape of a 17-year-old girl in Delaware County would have been prevented had proper background check protocol been carried out. The young girl in question was sexually assaulted by a home health aide working with her family. The aide in question, a 31-year-old male, had been hired to help the family care for the girl's older brother. Allegedly, the suspect touched the girl inappropriately with his hands and mouth.

The health aide doesn't have a criminal record in Ohio, but he was convicted of assaulting another woman in North Carolina four years ago. Such a charge would likely have disqualified the man from candidacy for any home healthcare position. However, the charge was mistakenly overlooked, and from the looks of it, it was missed because someone failed to run the proper background checks.

Indeed, a Health Department spokeswoman said that the state of Ohio requires background checks for home health workers to look through records from the past five years. By default, these criminal screenings start with checks of records just in the state of Ohio. If the health worker in question has been employed in Ohio for five or more years, then their prospective employers can stop after the state check. However, if the worker moved to Ohio in the last five years, then their employer needs to go one step further and obtain background checks from other states in which that worker has lived.

In this case, the health worker had only been working in Ohio for four years, which means that background checks should have been run in other states. Had this protocol been properly observed, the man's assault conviction (and the 55 days he spent in jail as a sentence for that crime) would have been discovered. Evidently, though, only state checks were run, so employers didn't know about the man's criminal record. As a result, he was allowed to get a job as a home health worker, and by connection, harm a young and defenseless victim in her home.

The worker was arrested, indicted on two counts of rape, and jailed under a $100,000 bond. He will likely face prison time for his crime. More questionable, however, is what will happen to the man's employer, Atlas Home Health Care. The company has so far declined to comment about the incident, but it's fairly clear that they failed to follow state policies regarding employee background checks. Some sort of fine from the state, or even a civil case from the victim, could plague the company in the coming months.

Overall, this case just underlines the need to run thorough background checks in all situations. If you run a company, you obviously need to make sure you are following all local, state, or national background check guidelines. More than that, though, you need to consider the position you are hiring for. In this case, the employer was looking to hire a person who would be going into people's homes without supervision. Such a work environment demands the most thorough criminal and sex offender background checks possible, whether or not they are required by law.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • December 04 Chicago Public Schools has dismissed hundreds of employees, coaches, vendors, and volunteers based on background check findings. The district recently vowed to re-check the majority of its 68,000 employees after a Chicago Tribune investigation revealed holes in its background check policies.
  • November 29 Striving to create a safer environment more conducive to productive training and leadership development, the Army has recently moved to adopt a uniform policy of background checks for certain roles. 
  • November 27 California’s biggest public school district is waiving the cost of volunteer background checks. The move is meant to encourage more family - and community members to get involved with the school district.
  • November 22 Contractors play an important role in the workforce, delivering services to both individuals and organizations. Vetting contractors for suitability continues to be a challenge, as two recent articles prove.
  • November 21 When it comes to background and pre-employment checks, it can be instructive to look at the characteristics of the ten most massive U.S. employers.
  • November 20 The #MeToo movement is bringing about legislative changes employers need to know about. We review some of the laws recently passed in California.
  • November 19

    Will a criminal conviction show up on your background check forever? In most states, there is a year limit for how long background check companies can report older criminal information.

  • November 15

    Replacing an inconsistent array of procedures, Ontario's government has passed into law a reform act intended to clarify how police departments should handle requests for information to be used in background checks. 

  • November 14 The federal government has vowed to cut its backlog of security clearance background checks in half by spring. Currently, the backlog is approximately 600,000 names strong.
  • November 12 To ensure the best hires, DFWSPF has implemented a stringent employee screening process—one that includes background searches through