Could Better Screenings Have Prevented a Baton Rouge Case Where a Janitor Raped a Student?

By Michael Klazema on 1/1/2015

On November 23, 2013, a janitor at a Baton Rouge middle school allegedly pushed a 14-year-old girl into an empty classroom and forcibly raped her. The student didn't report the case for several months, which means the former janitor is only just now facing charges. The twist is that the 31-year-old African American man is already in the middle of a 10-year prison sentence for auto theft. In other words, the rape appears just one more crime in the life of a man who can only be classified as a criminal. And yet, he was allowed to work in a middle school, among students, and even passed a background check.

The question is, were the checks as thorough as they could have been? Or could better (or additional) screenings have flagged the janitor as a dangerous man and stopped the rape from ever occurring?

The janitor worked at North Banks Middle School, but he was not actually an employee.Rather, he was a contract worker employed by a janitorial company in the area called Millennium Consulting Network. That company, in turn, was contracted by Aramark, a firm entrusted with providing maintenance and janitorial services to the schools in the area.

In other words, the chain of responsibility for screening the janitor was a long one. With such a convoluted hiring chain, it would have been easy for background checks to go overlooked. That's not what happened in this case, though. On the contrary, Aramark was completely on top of things, and reportedly ran the same checks on the janitor in question that are run on all teachers in the state. These screenings included a fingerprint criminal check through the Louisiana State Police Department.

When Aramark ran a background screening of the janitor, the checks ultimately came back clean: the man had no criminal convictions on his record. As it turns out, he did have a number of arrests. both in the spring of 2011. One of the arrests occurred because the man was caught driving a stolen milk truck; the other came for possession of drug paraphernalia that suggested he had a habit for doing crack cocaine. Both charges were evidently dropped, which means they didn't come up on a background check. The man was hired to his janitorial position later in 2011.

Of course, no one can be blamed for not knowing about the man's arrest history. Per the EEOC, arrest reports should not be used to make hiring decisions because they do not prove guilt. Still, there were other checks that Aramark or the North Banks Middle School could have run to find out that the janitor in question was an unsavory individual.

For one thing, the man was facing charges for auto theft at the time that the rape occurred. He had been arrested for auto theft on March 31, 2013, and his sentencing hearing was set to take place on December 1. Would North Banks Middle School or Aramark have allowed the man to continue work had they known he was facing a felony conviction?

Furthermore, at his sentencing hearing for the auto theft crime, the janitor asked the court for leniency, saying that he was addicted to crack cocaine and needed to go to rehab rather than prison. He said that if he had been in the correct frame of mind, he never would have committed the theft. If Aramark or North Banks did regular drug tests on employees, the man certainly would have been flagged as a danger to students, he would have been dismissed, and he never would have had the chance to assault a 14-year-old girl. Schools may take criminal background checks more seriously than most employees, but perhaps they aren't the only checks that schools should be running.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.

  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.

  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.