New York County Wonders about Background Checks for Assistant Coroners

By Michael Klazema on 12/23/2014

Legislators in Cayuga County, New York are wondering whether or not they should implement background checks for assistant coroners working in the area. These officials work frequently at death scenes to collect sensitive or valuable materials from the deceased, including medications and jewelry. However, assistant coroners are evidently not subject to any sort of background check by the county, even though they are government employees.

The fear, it seems, is that assistant coroners could easily steal items from death or crime scenes without anyone noticing. From valuables to prescription meds, the deceased often leave behind items that an assistant coroner might feel inclined to pocket for personal gain. In other words, recovering these items and keeping track of them is an important job that relies a lot on the honor system. Background checks would help make sure that assistant coroners are trustworthy and well-trained individuals.

The County Sheriff for Cayuga acknowledged the hefty responsibility inherent in the assistant corner job. He also said that the city might look bad a theft or some other breach of responsibility occurred with one of these coroners. That would be ever truer if the assistant coroner in question had a criminal history that might have predicted his or her actions. Such an incident would make it appear that the county wasn't doing its due diligence in hiring or managing staff.

For that reason, a Judicial & Public Safety Committee for the Cayuga County Legislature is mulling over the prospect of background checks for coroner's assistants. One legislator was worried about stepping on the toes of the county's lead coroner, an elected official who appoints his or her own assistants. If the Judicial & Public Safety Committee implemented background checks for assistant coroners, the legislator thinks that the committee would end up having too much say in who was hired to those positions.

That particular fear seems like an odd one. All manner of elected officials, from town mayors to the President of the United States, appoint staffs. That doesn't mean those staffs should be exempted from background checks, or that the action of requiring background checks takes power away from the elected official. On the contrary, the official still gets to propose appointments: their chosen staff members merely have to pass background checks to prove their trustworthiness and fitness for the job at hand.

In any case, it's fairly clear from the sidelines that any individual trusted with handling the belongings of the deceased should be background checked. As grave robbers throughout history would attest, it's fair easier, in most cases, to rob the dead than to rob the living. If background checks could help prove that Cayuga County's assistant coroners are trustworthy enough to avoid that temptation, then those checks should be in place.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 22 Countrywide, states and local municipalities have committed to ban the box legislation, seeking to equalize opportunities in the job market for those with criminal histories.
  • March 22

    Thinking about becoming a firefighter? Here are some of the background check requirements you might face.

  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants.