Massachusetts Legislation Would Call for Background Checks of High School Referees

By Michael Klazema on 2/17/2015

States across the country have been pushing harder and harder for background checks of anyone who works with kids. Teachers, coaches, daycare workers, bus drivers, school volunteers, even school visitors policies have recently been discussed to extend or deepen background checks for all of these groups. And in Massachusetts, the battle is continuing with a group that not every state has thought of yet: referees for high school sporting events.

According to a report from the Boston Globe, refs are one of the last groups in the public school circle that are not yet required to undergo background checks. At this point, virtually everyone who works with school kids in Massachusetts has passed a background check. Referees,”who are licensed through the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association, are the exception to that rule, though, and a State Representative wants to close the gap.

With a new piece of proposed legislation, referees would no longer be allowed to officiate high school sporting events without first passing a background checks. Since MIAA has some 7,600 referees that are eligible to officiate sporting events,”across 374 member schools, that would mean a good deal of legwork for the association.

Still, it's legwork that's necessary. The proposed legislation follows an investigation that the Boston Globe did toward the end of last year, which found that there were a number of ex-convicts (and even a few sex offenders) working as referees in the state of Massachusetts. The investigation also discovered that the MIAA doesn't run any sort of criminal background checks on its referees, which means the association has no idea how many criminals or sex offenders are out there officiating games between student-athletes.

This information is obviously shocking, considering how frequently these individuals work with young and vulnerable kids. Perhaps even more alarming is how many states in the country don't have background check policies in place for school sports officials. Sure, about 20 states have now passed laws requiring criminal checks for referees. As the legislation in Massachusetts shows, that number should continue to increase in the coming years. Still, the country is far from 100% in terms of this kind of safety coverage.

A subcommittee for the MIAA is working on drawing up plans for how background checks of officials would work. Part of the problem is that a state regulation stipulates that school districts should be the ones to screen workers. Employment lines are blurry for high school sports officials, with the schools hiring referees for regular season games that they host, and with the MIAA technically serving as the "employer" for referees at post-season playoff and championship events. It's a convoluted system, and one that makes it difficult to decide which entity should be background checking which referees.

Still, it seems highly likely that Massachusetts will soon require referees to undergo background checks, one way or another. It just isn't clear now who will have to run those checks, or how they will be done.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.