Lawrence, Kansas Mulls New Background Check Regulations for Taxi Cab Drivers

By Michael Klazema on 3/11/2015

While many other parts of the country ponder whether or not ridesharing companies such as Uber and Lyft have thorough enough background checks, officials in Lawrence, Kansas are mulling an ordinance that would require criminal background checks for a similar group: taxi drivers. Most cities with taxi services already require drivers to submit to criminal background screenings. Usually, these checks are just one step that drivers must take in order to become licensed to operate a cab. Surprisingly, though, Lawrence, the sixth biggest city in Kansa, has never required these types of criminal checks for drivers in the past.

The new ordinance, currently under consideration by the Lawrence City Council, would change all of that. The new policy would require every cab driver to submit to a background check during the licensing process. Certain crimes, including any type of felony, any instance of suspended license, and any conviction for driving under the influence, would automatically disqualify a driver's application for a license. The checks would also take a look at outstanding warrants, and deny any applicant currently facing one.

An ordinance such as this is a long time coming for a city like Lawrence. Taxi drivers are entrusted with the safety and wellbeing of their customers every single day. Therefore, a driver with a DUI or two on their record, or one convicted of rape or other sexually related offenses, poses an obvious threat to passengers. Background checks at the licensing stage help to neutralize those threats and keep dangerous or untrustworthy people from ever becoming cab drivers. Without a policy like that in place, there is essentially no filter to make sure that predators, drunk drivers, and other dangerous individuals are kept out of the public transportation industry.

Even if Lawrence's existing cab driver policy is lacking, it's at least fortunate that it wasn't a specific cab driver incident that caused the City Council to consider this ordinance. Indeed, there have as of yet been no reported incidents in the city of a cab driver threatening, hurting, or killing a passenger. Rather, this particular ordinance is on the table because two cab companies in the city, Ground Transportation Services and Jayhawk Taxi, asked the city to take a critical look at licensing processes.

These two companies may have ulterior motives in asking the city to investigate licensing policies: both are concerned about the number of independent cab drivers who are getting licenses in the city. Even if GTS and Jayhawk have something to gain from Lawrence tightening the cab driver licensing process, though, their request could still function to make the city's public transportation a bit safer. In addition to considering background checks for all drivers, the city council is also thinking about raising the insurance benchmarks that cabs in the city are expected to meet.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.