Arizona Doesn't Require Background Checks or Inspections for Dentists

By Michael Klazema on 3/17/2015

In most states, dentists are treated much like doctors and nurses when it comes to the licensing process. That means that, usually, dental professionals are required to undergo background checks to practice. There are countless good reasons for this. First of all, background checks verify educational credentials and would make sure that no dentists without the proper degrees or training would be permitted to work with patients. Secondly, background checks would take a look at criminal history to make sure that a dentist didn't pose a threat to his or her patients.

In Arizona, though, none of this is true. The state's Board of Dental Examiners doesn't require professionals in the state to go through background checks as part of the licensing process. In other words, every person regardless of their past crimes could be licensed to practice dentistry in Arizona, simply because the state isn't taking the steps necessary to prevent them from doing so.

That could change soon. A piece of legislation currently making its way through the Arizona House of Representatives would require all applicants seeking a dental or dental hygienist license to undergo a fingerprint background check. The legislation, currently labeled as House Bill 2496, comes recommended from state auditors, who last year highlighted the lack of dentist background checks as a substantial oversight. All neighboring states, including California, New Mexico, and Nevada, already require dentist background checks. The lack of background checks for dentists is just the tip of the iceberg, though, for a broader problem that the state has with dental regulation. For instance, the Arizona dental board also doesn't do routine inspections of dental offices in the state. Many types of facilities, such as doctor's offices or restaurants, are frequently inspected by the state. Weirdly, dental offices are inexplicably left off the list, an issue that has resulted in unsanitary or unsafe conditions at some of these facilities.

Add the fact that dentists in Arizona are not required to have malpractice insurance, and that the dental board is extremely lenient when it comes to disciplining dentists for malpractice claims, and it's clear that the state's dental regulation is below that of other states. The House bill that is currently pushing for dentist background checks could be the first step to repairing the current system and making Arizona a safer place to receive dental care.


Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.