New Connecticut Legislation Could Help Shorten Gap for Teacher Background Checks

By Michael Klazema on 3/16/2015

Under current Connecticut state law, teachers have up to 30 days after hiring to submit to fingerprinting and background checks. Combined with the backlogs that state and federal background checks often have, this law means that some teachers are allowed to work in schools for extended periods of time before they even pass a background check. For obvious reasons, this law is problematic. Teachers and other educational employees spend considerable amounts of unsupervised time with children, something that simply should not be allowed if they have not passed background investigations.

A Connecticut State Representative is in agreement with that last point and has drafted legislation that could change the requirements for good. Introduced to the House Education Committee, the proposal would cut the background check window to a fraction of what it is now. Indeed, the main goal of the legislation would be "To shorten the period of time that a person hired by a board of education is required to submit to a criminal history records check from 30 days to five business days". In other words, teachers would essentially have to get fingerprinted and have their background checks done immediately upon hiring or risk losing their job opportunity.

Of course, simply closing the gap for new hires to submit to checks does little good if state repositories or federal databases take their time processing those checks. That's why the proposal also includes a section that would require Connecticut's Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection "to conduct expedited criminal records" for teachers, and "to waive the fee for such expedited service". Obviously, there's nothing that the state government can do to expedite whichever checks are being done through federal databases. Still, though, having state criminal checks processed within a week or so following a teacher's hiring would go a long way toward making schools safer.

Still, one does have to wonder if Connecticut would be better off not allowing teachers to start work at all until their background checks are cleared. Teachers might not like such an arrangement since it would force them to wait a bit between getting an employment offer and starting work. But the bottom line shouldn't be the contentment of the teachers, but the safety of the students. And there is no doubt that students would be safer if no teachers were allowed to start work before passing a criminal background check.

Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.