Members of Air Force Sexual Assault Prevention Unit Didn't Face Background Checks, Go through Training

By Michael Klazema on 6/3/2015

The Air Force Sexual Assault Prevention & Response program is designed to combat sexual assault in the United States military, and to work with victims of sexual assault crimes. According to an internal audit conducted in April 2014, though, many of the personnel appointed to work with the program never went through background checks or received training of any kind prior to taking up their new roles.

The good news is that the audit, which was conducted last year by the Air Force Audit Agency, inspired the military to start refining screening policies for Sexual Assault Prevention & Response personnel almost immediately. In fact, the head of training and development for the SAPR program told The News Tribune, the publication that obtained the audit documents and reported them to the public, that such oversights "cannot happen anymore." The Air Force has supposedly implemented background checks and training regimens for any airmen involved in the SAPR program, to prevent potential threats to sexual assault victims.

Still, the findings of the audit remain damning for the Air Force. Considering the sensitive nature of work that involves victims of sexual assault, it goes without saying that everyone involved in the SAPR program should have been screened for past sexual offenses themselves. However, according to the audit, 826 of the personnel members for the program did not receive background checks, checks that the Air Force is legally required to conduct. That's roughly a third of the 2,500-some individuals who were chosen to be a part of the program, either as "response coordinators" or as "victim advocates."

To make matters worse, 167 of the personnel chosen to work SAPR had not yet received security clearances from the United States Military; 117 members never received any kind of training on how to respond to reports of sexual assault or work with assault victims; and 852 individuals didn't participate in required "refresher training" prior to starting work with the new department. The final figure of 1,435 highlights the number of personnel who had something wrong with their records before joining SAPR, considerably more than half of all involved program personnel.

From the sounds of it, the oversights might just have been the result of the Air Force rushing to implement the new sexual assault program. Congress has been putting pressure on different branches of the United States Military as of late, with the goal of reducing the frequency of sexual assaults in the military. A 2012 Pentagon survey suggested that 26,000 sexual assault cases occurr in the military ranks annually. A recent study from the Rand Corporation estimates that the number was down closer to 20,000 for 2014. As you can see, the number is dropping, but there is still a long way to go. Hopefully, the new background check and training standards in place for the Air Force Sexual Assault Prevention & Response program will help to reduce the case number even further.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.
  • February 27 Governor Asa Hutchinson signed House Bill 2216 which amends the employer’s directives regarding a current or prospective employee’s social media account.
  • February 23 A Texas summer camp is in the spotlight after an unflattering investigation from a local news channel. The case has some parents asking what they can do to vet summer camp programs before enrolling their kids.