New Law in Nevada Seeks to Expand Background Checks for Gaming Industry Employees

By Michael Klazema on 6/30/2015
Nevada will soon give extra leeway to gaming industry employers looking to gain insight into their applicants' financial histories. The state's legislature recently passed a bill that will remove certain credit reporting agency prohibitions, hopefully making it easier for casinos and other employers to spot applicants with dodgy or suspicious financial histories.

Previously, Federal Law has barred credit reporting agencies from turning over certain pieces of financial history to employers, including bankruptcy filings dating back more than 10 years and other negative credit financial history (including civil judgments or criminal convictions) dating back more than seven years. A corresponding state law reaffirmed similar rules for Nevada employers.

However, now that the state legislature has passed Senate Bill 409, those rules are going to change. The new law will overturn previous state and Federal statutes, giving credit agencies permission to disclose older bankruptcy filings (and other pieces of negative credit history) to gaming industry employers.

In order to make a change, the bill noted that the Federal version of the credit reporting law includes an exception. In cases where a credit report is being "prepared in connection with the employment of an individual whose salary will be greater than $75,000," the credit reporting agency is allowed to disclose older findings. Nevada will now be parroting that exception into their own law, effectively giving the state's many casinos the ability to dig much deeper into the financial histories of applicants.

The bill was sponsored by State Senator Mark Lipparelli, who actually has ties to the gaming industry. Previously, Lipparelli served as Chairman for the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Senate Bill 409, therefore, was something of a tribute to his past, as well as a favor to former colleagues. By being able to run more in-depth background checks on applicants, gaming industry employers will be able to better protect their assets and their customers.

Job searchers and equal hiring proponents, meanwhile, will likely be quite critical of the new law. After all, under Lipparelli's amendment, certain financial mistakes and crimes can now follow a person forever in Nevada. A bankruptcy filing from 20 years ago, for instance, could cost someone a job today, regardless of what their current financial status and overall reputation is. And while gaming industry employers will hopefully weigh the age of certain mistakes and offenses against what the applicant in question has done since, there is no language in Senate Bill 409 that broaches the subject of fair or equal employment opportunity.

So is this new law a true chance for the Nevada casino industry to better protect themselves from bad hires? Only time will tell.

Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.