New Law in Connecticut Requires New Levels of Transparency, Accountability from Charter Schools

By Michael Klazema on 7/29/2015
Following an investigation that revealed corruption, nepotism, and little to no accountability at a Connecticut charter school, the state is fighting back with a new law. On the last day of the state's most recent legislative session, Connecticut lawmakers passed what is being called the "charter transparency bill." Now, the legislation has been officially signed into law by Governor Daniel Malloy, which means that charter schools have a few new guidelines and regulation to learn for the new school year.

According to a report from West Hartford News, the new law makes several brand new demands, including the requirement of background checks for all charter school employees who have direct contact with students, the auditing and monitoring of one charter school per year by the state education commissioner, and the adoption of "anti-nepotism and conflict of interest policies."

Since most states already have laws on the books calling for background checks of teachers and other school employees that have contact with children, it may seem surprising that such screenings had to be mentioned in this bill. But it's always been relatively unclear how charter schools should be regulated in that regard: they receive public funding, but operate independently of established school districts, and typically make their own rules about curriculum and other things. Smartly, this new law makes sure that Connecticut charter schools are taking the same precautions to protect child safety as public schools.

The other stipulations of the new bill will help to increase the accountability of charter schools, as well as the overall quality of the education provided therein. The audits will hopefully work like a "random background check" or "random inspection" policy would, encouraging charter schools across Connecticut to follow all state laws and policies, and provide the best education possible, in case of an audit. The anti-nepotism rule, meanwhile, will seek to solve a common charter school problem, where the governing councils behind the schools hire friends or family members instead of executing a full employee search to find a fully qualified teacher or employee.

Overall, these new rules are strong ones that should help to make sure that charter schools in Connecticut are being held to the same standards (in terms of safety, education, employment, and more) that other schools are. Generally, the best charter schools are praised for their unique approach to learning, their innovative and passionate teachers, and a greater level of teacher-student one-on-one engagement than is possible at public schools. The "charter transparency bill" should be able to add a bit of structure and accountability into the system without sacrificing what makes charter schools an attractive option in the first place.

Industry News

Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.