Arrest of Coach Highlights Lack of Background Checks in Nashville Youth Sports League

By Michael Klazema on 8/27/2015
A 29-year-old man who had coached a youth sports team in Nashville for three years was recently arrested and charged with felony drug and illegal firearm possession. Police visited the coach's home on an unrelated complaint, but asked to search his home when they smelled marijuana. The coach allowed the officers into his house, and they subsequently found the (loaded) gun, as well as 16 marijuana plants. They arrested the suspect for "possession with intent to deliver" charges on both the drugs and the gun.

According to a report published by The Tennessean, the suspect was a coach with the Donelson-Hermitage Warriors, a youth football team based close to where he lived. The president of the team, as well as the team's board, suspended the suspect as soon as they learned of the charges brought against their coach. However, when journalists at The Tennessean pressed the president of the team to learn whether or not they run background checks on their coaches, he admitted that they do not.

Worse, the president said that background checks aren't required by the Tennessee Youth Football Alliance, the broader youth sports in which the Donelson-Hermitage Warriors play their games. That means that other youth football teams throughout the state could also have coaches on staff who have not been subject to background checks.

The president of the Donelson-Hermitage Warriors said his team was thinking about implementing background checks for coaches, who are all volunteers. However, he told The Tennessean that his team has "never had a need" for background checks in the past, simply because policy dictates that no coaches are ever left alone and unsupervised with kids.

It's evidently not uncommon for youth sporting organizations in Tennessee to leave background checks up to individual teams. The Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, which administers athletic events for junior and senior high schools throughout the state, does not have a blanket background check policy either. Instead, the organization assumes that school districts will have their own background check policies in place for coaches and volunteers. It's unclear whether or not the association runs checks on event referees and officials.

While both the Donelson-Hermitage Warriors and the Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association both have reasons for skipping background checks, implementing such policies would still help to close loopholes and keep kids safe. While a youth sports team can say that no kids will ever be left alone and unsupervised with a coach, background checks are still a necessity to make sure they aren't putting sex offenders and other predators in a position where they have a chance to even get to know kids.

As for the Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, while it's probably true that most junior highs and high schools in the state are already running background checks on coaches of their own volition, putting a blanket policy in place just to make sure would at very least make sure of that fact.


Tag Cloud
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • March 20 Employers who use E-Verify must follow the proper steps and procedures when they receive a “tentative non-confirmation notice” from either the Social Security Administration or Department of Homeland Security. Failure to follow the proper procedures can cost employers both time and money. 
  • March 20

    Four Department of Commerce employees are out after their background checks resulted in security clearance denials. All four had worked high-ranking positions for months despite incomplete background checks.

  • March 15 As more states legalize the recreational use of cannabis, they contend with the emergence of new industries surrounding marijuana cultivation and production. 
  • March 14 In most cases, it is easy to determine where an issue might show up on a pre-employment background check. Citations for traffic violations or reckless driving charges will appear on a motor vehicle record check. Verdicts in a civil court case will show on a civil court background check. And criminal convictions—from petty theft to violent felonies—show up on criminal background checks.
  • March 13 How many years back do employment background checks go? This question can have multiple different answers depending on the situation.
  • March 13 A new bill in Florida would require landlords of apartment complexes to present tenants with verifications of employee background checks to give them peace of mind the people working in and around their homes are trustworthy.
  • March 08 Police officers working with the University of Texas at Arlington recently arrested a man who had avoided police capture on a warrant out of Oregon for nearly two decades. The man, whose real name is Daniel Charles Ray Hanson, spent those 17 years using a variety of fake names and identification documents to move around the country, often engaging with educational institutions under false pretenses. Police say Hanson regularly went by at least three different aliases. He sports a rap sheet that stretches back to an arson conviction in 1995. 
  • March 07

    The Future of EEOC Guidance in Texas Is Up in the Air

    The EEOC issued guidance in 2012 warning employers about the dangers of enforcing categorical policies to bar candidates with criminal histories. That guidance is not enforceable in Texas thanks to a recent court ruling.

  • March 05 Vermont is the latest state to restrict employers’ access to and use of social media accounts of employees and applicants. 
  • March 01 In an age of "industry disruptors" turning established business models on their heads, companies such as Uber and Lyft rely on a unique workforce of individuals outside the traditional employer-employee context. Uber calls them "partners" while other businesses refer to them as "independent contractors," the official classification these individuals use for tax purposes. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) revealed they had warned a business, Postmates, for misclassifying their staff as independent contractors. In the NLRB's determination, these individuals were employees.