Blog

 
     

Hillary Clinton Wants to Ban the Box for Federal Job Applicants

By Michael Klazema on 11/2/2015
The topic of pre-employment screening has officially become a part of the 2016 Presidential Election cycle. According to a recent report from TIME, Hillary Clinton has gone on record saying that she wants to ban the box for Federal Government jobs. Said another way, the former First Lady and current presidential hopeful believes that the Federal Government should remove questions about criminal history from all job applications. More than that, Clinton would reportedly take executive action to prevent the government from asking job applicants about their criminal pasts.

Ban the box policies are not new in the United States. On the contrary, the "Fair Chance" employment movement has been gathering steam over the past few years, with an increasing number of cities, counties, and states enacting legislation to prevent employers from asking applicants if they have ever been convicted of a crime. So far, banning the box has been far more common for public employers than for private employers. However, several major municipalities, including New York City, do have laws in place banning the box for both public and private jobs.

Clinton's executive order, were it to come to fruition, would be the next logical step in the narrative of the Fair Chance movement. There are already several subjects that employers simply can't ask about on job applications, including sexual orientation and religion. These rules are in place to prevent employment discrimination and give all applicants a better chance of being seriously considered by hiring managers. Criminal history, it seems, is destined to join that particular "no-fly" zone.

Banning the box for all Federal employers and contractors also makes sense in the context of Clinton's campaign platform. The Democratic frontrunner has made criminal justice reform a centerpiece of her candidacy so far, fighting against mass incarceration and racial profiling, among other issues. Since ban the box policies are all about giving ex-convicts a better chance of proving their worth to employers, bringing such a policy to the Federal level would be a way for Clinton to make a big splash and start living up to her promises very early on in her theoretical presidency.

What does this mean for background checks? As with other ban the box policies, Federal employers would still be allowed to run background checks under Clinton's policy. Those checks would merely have to wait until later on in the employment vetting process, likely until after the first interview.

Source: http://time.com/4094715/hillary-clinton-criminal-history-reform/

Tag Cloud
Categories
Recent Posts

Latest News

  • June 20 Repeat background checks are becoming more common, with companies in India leading the charge. What does this trend look like, and how can employers embrace it now to stay ahead of the curve?
  • June 19

    Every federal job involves a background check of some kind. These background checks and how they are evaluated vary based on job, department, and security clearance level.


  • June 18

  • June 14 Ban the box laws aim to improve opportunities for employment. Could they have the opposite effect instead?
  • June 13 Jacobs Petroleum Products is a regional petroleum company that operates throughout Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Maryland. Apart from their employees carrying much responsibility and have frequent contact with customers, the company’s hiring also tends to be segmented since individual store managers are responsible for hiring talent for their own stores. In this employment landscape, Jacobs Petroleum Products needed a reliable and effective way to screen its new hires for criminal infractions and other red flags.
  • June 12

    The University of Wisconsin System may tweak its hiring and reference check processes. The potential changes come after one of UW’s assistant deans was accused of sexual harassment.


  • June 07 Stories of abuse by coaches in youth sports leagues continue to crop up around the country, but rules and guidelines remain patchy and enforcement is often lacking. The struggle to implement an effective system continues nationwide.
  • June 07 Financial background checks, usually referred to as credit history checks, can be an effective way to find out if a candidate is fit to handle accounts, financial data, and other assets at your business.
  • June 06 The Society for Human Resource Management and the Charles Koch Institute recently commissioned a survey to find out how willing employers were to hire people with criminal records. The study indicates that managers, HR professionals, and employees themselves are becoming more comfortable with the idea of hiring and working with ex-offenders.
  • June 04 Are fingerprint background checks the gold standard for employee screening, or are they overhyped? We look at some of the myths and misconceptions surrounding these checks.